Literature DB >> 7310737

Single photon signals in fly photoreceptors and first order interneurones at behavioral threshold.

A Dubs, S B Laughlin, M V Srinivasan.   

Abstract

1. The contrast sensitivity of the optomotor response of the fly Musca domestica was measured using a moving sinusoidal grating as the stimulus. In parallel experiments intracellular recordings were made from photoreceptors and first order visual interneurones to to determine their responses to the same threshold stimuli. Measurements of the spatial modulation transfer function for photoreceptors confirm that the optics of the eye were intact during recordings. 2. At the lowest intensity at which one can obtain an optomotor response, the photoreceptor signal is a train of discrete depolarizations, or bumps. With constant intensity stimuli, the temporal distribution of bumps followed the Poisson distribution with a mean rate of proportional to luminance. The mean bump rate at the threshold intensity for a behavioural response is 1.7 +/- 0.7 s-1 (mean +/- S.D., n = 25). 3. Calibrations and the statistical properties of the bump train indicate that a bump represents one effective photon, implying that the bump : photon ratios are quantum capture efficiencies. 4. At low intensities the first order interneurones (the large monopolar cells or LMCs) show hyperpolarizing bumps each triggered by a receptor bump. Using a point source stimulus, centred in the field of view, the LMC bump rate is six times that in a single receptor viewing the same stimulus, as expected from the known projection of six receptor axons to each LMC. When using an extended stimulus (the grating), the bump rate is 18-20 times that in receptors. Comparison with earlier work suggests that this increased lateral summation of receptor inputs to LMCs only occurs at very low intensities. 5. In both receptor and LMCs the amplitudes and wave forms of bumps depend upon the position of a point source stimulus within the field of view. With the light in the periphery of the field the bumps are smaller and slower than when the light is in the centre. This difference in response suggests that spatial stimulation is brought about by lateral interactions, possibly between receptors. 6. At higher mean intensities the signal-to-noise ratios in receptors responding to the appropriate threshold stimuli increase with intensity. This is suggestive of a decrease in the extent of spatial and/or temporal summation in the optomotor pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7310737      PMCID: PMC1246791          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  12 in total

1.  DISCRETE SUBTHRESHOLD POTENTIALS FROM THE DIMLY LIT INSECT EYE.

Authors:  J H SCHOLES
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  [OPTOMOTOR REACTIONS OF THE FLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA. DEPENDENCE OF THE REACTION ON WAVE LENGTH, VELOCITY, CONTRAST AND MEDIAN BRIGHTNESS OF PERIODICALLY MOVED STIMULUS PATTERNS].

Authors:  G FERMI; W REICHARDT
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1963-09

3.  The relationship between visual acuity and illumination in the fly, lucilia sericata.

Authors:  D Dvorak; A Snyder
Journal:  Z Naturforsch C Biosci       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb

4.  Voltage signal of photoreceptors at visual threshold.

Authors:  G L Fain; A M Granda; J M Maxwell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Intracellular responses from cells of the medulla of the fly, Calliphora erythrocephala.

Authors:  R D DeVoe; E M Ockleford
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-06-18       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  The fly can discriminate movement at signal/noise ratios as low as one-eighth.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; G D Bernard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  [Neural superposition eye].

Authors:  K Kirschfeld
Journal:  Fortschr Zool       Date:  1973

8.  [Release of elementary processes through single light quanta in fly eyes. Behavior experiments with the housefly Musca].

Authors:  W Reichardt; V Braitenberg; G Weidel
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1968-11

9.  Responses to single photons in a fly optomotor neurone.

Authors:  P G Lillywhite; D R Dvorak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons.

Authors:  D Dvorak; M V Srinivasan; A S French
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on earth.

Authors:  Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Discrimination of visual motion from flicker by identified neurons in the medulla of the fleshfly Sarcophaga bullata.

Authors:  C Gilbert; D K Penisten; R D DeVoe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Systems analysis of the single photon response in invertebrate photoreceptors.

Authors:  Alain Pumir; Jennifer Graves; Rama Ranganathan; Boris I Shraiman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Transfer of graded potentials at the photoreceptor-interneuron synapse.

Authors:  M Juusola; R O Uusitalo; M Weckström
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 5.  Insect photoreceptor adaptations to night vision.

Authors:  Anna Honkanen; Esa-Ville Immonen; Iikka Salmela; Kyösti Heimonen; Matti Weckström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The remarkable visual capacities of nocturnal insects: vision at the limits with small eyes and tiny brains.

Authors:  Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Electrical coupling of neuro-ommatidial photoreceptor cells in the blowfly.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Phototransduction and the evolution of photoreceptors.

Authors:  Gordon L Fain; Roger Hardie; Simon B Laughlin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  GABAergic lateral interactions tune the early stages of visual processing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Limor Freifeld; Damon A Clark; Mark J Schnitzer; Mark A Horowitz; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Microsaccadic sampling of moving image information provides Drosophila hyperacute vision.

Authors:  Mikko Juusola; An Dau; Zhuoyi Song; Narendra Solanki; Diana Rien; David Jaciuch; Sidhartha Anil Dongre; Florence Blanchard; Gonzalo G de Polavieja; Roger C Hardie; Jouni Takalo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.