Literature DB >> 7286272

The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.

K D Smith, L J Rodriguez-Rigau, E Steinberger.   

Abstract

The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of AID with either fresh or cryopreserved semen was investigated. A total of 238 patients were inseminated, resulting in 170 pregnancies during 1201 insemination cycles, an average of 5.0 cycles per pregnancy. Pregnancy rates were similar in those patients receiving either fresh or cryopreserved semen, but the number of cycles required for pregnancy to occur was doubled in the latter group. Ovulatory dysfunction further delayed the number of cycles before conception. The poorest results occurred in those patients with ovulatory dysfunction receiving cryopreserved semen. The timing of insemination was more important in patients receiving cryopreserved semen than those receiving fresh semen. With cryopreserved semen, pregnancy was not likely to occur unless the insemination was performed on the day of ovulation. These data suggest that frozen semen is less efficacious than fresh semen, a difference that is compounded by the presence of ovulatory dysfunction in the recipient. It is possible that an increase in the frequency of insemination from every other day to daily may improve the results of AID with cryopreserved semen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Artificial Insemination; Clomiphene; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Dropouts; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Gonadotropins; Menstruation Disorders; North America; Northern America; Ovulation; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy Rate; Reproduction; Reproductive Technologies; Sperm Banks; Texas; Time Factors; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7286272     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45800-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Therapeutic donor insemination with frozen semen.

Authors:  S G Scott; D Mortimer; P J Taylor; A Leader; H A Pattinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Sperm cryopreservation: state of the art.

Authors:  D P Wolf; P E Patton
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1989-12

3.  Effects of cryopreserved semen quality and timed intrauterine insemination on pregnancy rate and gender of offspring in a donor insemination program.

Authors:  R S Sidhu; R K Sharma; A Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The efficiency of cryopreserved semen versus fresh semen for in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer.

Authors:  H Yavetz; J B Lessing; Y Niv; A Amit; Y Barak; I Yovel; M P David; M R Peyser; L Yogev; Z Homonnai
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.