Literature DB >> 1919260

The efficiency of cryopreserved semen versus fresh semen for in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer.

H Yavetz1, J B Lessing, Y Niv, A Amit, Y Barak, I Yovel, M P David, M R Peyser, L Yogev, Z Homonnai.   

Abstract

The efficiency of cryopreserved donor semen versus fresh donor semen in an in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme was evaluated. Thirty-nine in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer cycles were performed using fresh donor semen (group A) and 74 cycles were carried out using cryopreserved semen (group B). All patients underwent a uniform controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using high doses of human menopausal gonadotropins. Oocytes were retrieved transvaginally under ultrasound imaging. Semen (fresh or frozen-thawed) were prepared for insemination by a washing technique. Each ovum was inseminated with 500,000-600,000 motile spermatozoa. No significant difference was noted between the two groups regarding female age, duration of infertility, and number of ova retrieved per aspiration. Even though the fertilization rate in group B was significantly lower than in group A (55.5 +/- 3.8 vs 70.4 +/- 3.5, P = 0.008), pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were similar--39.3 and 38.5%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1919260     DOI: 10.1007/bf01131704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf        ISSN: 0740-7769


  18 in total

1.  Frozen semen: efficiency in artificial insemination and advantage in testing for acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Authors:  J K Sherman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Survival of spermatozoa in a human sperm bank. Effects of long-term storage in liquid nitrogen.

Authors:  K D Smith; E Steinberger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cervical mucus penetration in vitro by fresh and frozen-preserved human semen specimens.

Authors:  B Fjällbrant; D R Ackerman
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1969-12

4.  Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. II. Postthaw chronology of motility and of zona-free hamster ova penetration.

Authors:  J K Critser; B W Arneson; D V Aaker; A R Huse-Benda; G D Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  A prospective randomized study comparing fresh semen and cryopreserved semen for artificial insemination by donor.

Authors:  D A Iddenden; H N Sallam; W P Collins
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1985

6.  Artificial donor insemination frozen versus fresh semen.

Authors:  J Leeton; T Selwood; A Trounson; C Wood
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  Motility characteristics of human sperm, nonfrozen and cryopreserved.

Authors:  B A Keel; A M Karow
Journal:  Arch Androl       Date:  1980-05

8.  Transmission of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) by artificial insemination by donor.

Authors:  G J Stewart; J P Tyler; A L Cunningham; J A Barr; G L Driscoll; J Gold; B J Lamont
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-09-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Penetration of zona-free hamster ova and bovine cervical mucus by fresh and frozen human spermatozoa.

Authors:  R L Urry; D T Carrell; D B Hull; R G Middleton; M C Wiltbank
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.

Authors:  K D Smith; L J Rodriguez-Rigau; E Steinberger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.