Literature DB >> 7285729

Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position.

M D Kaye, R M Wexler.   

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of body position on esophageal peristalsis, normal subjects were studied by manometry in upright and supine positions. In each position, responses to a standard sequence of "dry" and "wet" swallows were recorded. Amplitudes, durations, and propagation times of esophageal contractions were uniformly greater with wet than with dry swallows. Peristaltic amplitudes were greater throughout the length of the esophagus in the supine than in the upright position. Peristaltic wave durations were relatively little influenced by body position, while propagation times were shorter in the upper esophagus but longer in the proximal half of the lower esophagus in the upright than in the supine position. All differences were more marked with wet than with dry swallows. Thus, esophageal peristalsis is significantly altered by body position, and the effect of the latter is bolus-dependent.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7285729     DOI: 10.1007/BF01309493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  8 in total

1.  Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Esophageal motility.

Authors:  F J INGELFINGER
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Instrumentation and methods for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  W J Dodds
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1976-05

4.  Pressure profile of esophageal peristalsis in normal humans as measured by direct intraesophageal transducers.

Authors:  T J Humphries; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-07

5.  Effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure on esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; E T Stewart; J J Stef; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; D P Reid; E T Stewart; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Intraluminal pressure changes of the human esophagus.

Authors:  S Masaki; S Kiuchi
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Oesophageal peristalsis. A simple system for the recording of oesophageal peristalsis, and the influence of bolus volume on peak peristaltic pressure amplitude.

Authors:  S Boesby; E Y Söndergaard; T Madsen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.423

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics. Findings in 1013 patients.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Effect of bolus viscosity.

Authors:  C P Dooley; B Schlossmacher; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Accuracy of abbreviated manometry in detecting esophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  R E Clouse; L B Weinstock; D M Ferney
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions.

Authors:  J E Richter; W C Wu; D N Johns; J N Blackwell; J L Nelson; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Does diet affect values obtained during prolonged ambulatory pressure monitoring.

Authors:  S Langevin; S F DeNuna; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Solid bolus transit by esophageal scintigraphy in patients with dysphagia and normal manometry and radiography.

Authors:  G Kjellén; J B Svedberg; L Tibbling
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Power of oesophageal peristalsis can be controlled voluntarily.

Authors:  R M Valori; M T Hallisey; J Dunn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Stationary vs. mapping manometry in evaluating dysphagia.

Authors:  L Novais; C Dalton; J E Richter
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans.

Authors:  V W Sears; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Esophageal function in humans. Effects of bolus consistency and temperature.

Authors:  C P Dooley; C Di Lorenzo; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.