Literature DB >> 2013416

Power of oesophageal peristalsis can be controlled voluntarily.

R M Valori1, M T Hallisey, J Dunn.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that oesophageal peristalsis can be modified voluntarily was explored. Six healthy male volunteers and eight female patients with angina like chest pain underwent oesophageal manometry. Each was asked to take a series of swallows, and to vary their size, in random order, by taking either a big gulp or a little swallow. None of the subjects experienced difficulty in doing so. In both groups the amplitude of oesophageal contractions were significantly greater after big gulps than little swallows (p less than 0.01) and this was true for wet (82.0 v 68.9 mmHg) and dry swallows (52.3 v 43.3 mmHg). For the patients' wet swallows the mean values were 73.0 and 56.0 mmHg. Thus, the amplitude of oesophageal peristalsis can be controlled voluntarily. This effect may account for some of the within subject variation in the amplitude of oesophageal contractions. During oesophageal manometry subjects should be encouraged to standardise the size of their swallows whenever possible. Patients with symptoms related to abnormal oesophageal peristalsis such as dysphagia, heartburn, and chest pain may benefit from biofeedback training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2013416      PMCID: PMC1378825          DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.3.236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

1.  Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis.

Authors:  J B Hollis; D O Castell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; W J Dodds; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Esophageal motility disorders and their response to calcium channel antagonists. The sphinx revisited.

Authors:  S Cohen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  A comparison between primary esophageal peristalsis following wet and dry swallows.

Authors:  W J Dodds; W J Hogan; D P Reid; E T Stewart; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Pharmacologic investigation of primary peristalsis in smooth muscle portion of opossum esophagus.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J Christensen; J Dent; R C Arndorfer; J D Wood
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1979-12

6.  Stress induces alteration of esophageal pressures in healthy volunteers and non-cardiac chest pain patients.

Authors:  K O Anderson; C B Dalton; L A Bradley; J E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Alteration of esophageal peristalsis by body position.

Authors:  M D Kaye; R M Wexler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  24-hour recording of esophageal pressure and pH in patients with noncardiac chest pain.

Authors:  J Janssens; G Vantrappen; G Ghillebert
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 22.682

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts on pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of diffuse oesophageal spasm.

Authors:  M Storr; H D Allescher; M Classen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.