Literature DB >> 7279582

Loudness and reaction time: I.

D L Kohfeld, J L Santee, N D Wallace.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7279582     DOI: 10.3758/bf03207370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation.

Authors:  G R Grice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time.

Authors:  D L Kohfeld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-10

3.  Impedance at the eardrum, middle-ear transmission, and equal loudness.

Authors:  S Ross
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Loudness determination at low sound frequencies.

Authors:  R P Hellman; J J Zwislocki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential.

Authors:  P H Skinner; H C Jones
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-06

6.  Temporal summation of loudness: an analysis.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound.

Authors:  D L Kohfeld
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05

8.  A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.

Authors:  R D Luce; D M Green
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Loudness as a function of the duration of auditory stimulation.

Authors:  G Ekman; B Berglund; U Berglund
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1966

10.  Matching functions and equal-sensation contours for loudness.

Authors:  S Ross
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

2.  Consequences of Base Time for Redundant Signals Experiments.

Authors:  James T Townsend; Christopher Honey
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents.

Authors:  L M Ward
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

4.  Intensity and number of alternatives in hue identification: Piéron's law and choice reaction time.

Authors:  R Schweickert; C Dahn; K McGuigan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-10

Review 5.  Sprint Start Regulation in Athletics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Matthieu Milloz; Kevin Hayes; Andrew J Harrison
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Reaction time to a tone in noise as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio and tone level.

Authors:  S Kemp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11

7.  Loudness and reaction time: II. Identification of detection components at different intensities and frequencies.

Authors:  D L Kohfeld; J L Santee; N D Wallace
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-06

8.  Loudness perception in the domestic cat: reaction time estimates of equal loudness contours and recruitment effects.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Nicole Little; Stephanie Saylor
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-07

Review 9.  Detection-Response Task-Uses and Limitations.

Authors:  Kristina Stojmenova; Jaka Sodnik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Simple reaction time for broadband sounds compared to pure tones.

Authors:  Josef Schlittenlacher; Wolfgang Ellermeier; Gül Avci
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.