Literature DB >> 7279424

Analgesic responses to morphine and placebo in individuals with postoperative pain.

J D Levine, N C Gordon, R Smith, H L Fields.   

Abstract

The effects of placebo and varying doses of intravenous morphine were studied in 74 patients. All patients underwent extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Two hours after onset of anesthesia all patients received a placebo (intravenous saline). One hour after the placebo administration each patient received either a second placebo or, 4, 6, 8 or 12 mg of morphine, double blind, via a hidden intravenous line. Pain level was evaluated 50 min after morphine administration using a visual analog scale. Pooled data from all patients produced a dose-response curve asymptotic by 8 mg. The mean pain relief following the second placebo was found to be between that obtained following hidden administration of 4 and 6 mg of morphine. When pain level reports for individuals were plotted two unexpected features appeared. First, no patient reported complete relief, even at the highest dose of morphine (12 mg). Second, pain level reports 50 min following each dose of morphine tended to be in two clusters. Within each cluster the average pain was independent of the dose of morphine administered. However, in groups receiving progressively higher doses of morphine, the percentage of patients within the low pain level cluster increased. These latter observations are most consistent with the concept that there is a step component for narcotic analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7279424     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90099-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  29 in total

1.  Unpacking the effects of acupuncture.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  A study of promethazine hydrochloride and pentazocine intramuscular sedation along with 2 % lidocaine hydrochloride and adrenaline and comparison to placebo along with 2 % lidocaine hydrochloride and adrenaline for surgical extraction of mandibular third molar.

Authors:  F Lalfamkima; Subhas Chandra Debnath; A K Adhyapok
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-11-30

Review 3.  The placebo effect: From concepts to genes.

Authors:  B Colagiuri; L A Schenk; M D Kessler; S G Dorsey; L Colloca
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Expectancy Reduces Symptoms but not Functional Impairment Following Exercise-induced Musculoskeletal Injury.

Authors:  William C Hedderson; Geoffrey C Dover; Steven Z George; Joshua A Crow; Paul A Borsa
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Placebo use in pain management: The role of medical context, treatment efficacy, and deception in determining placebo acceptability.

Authors:  Nkaku Kisaalita; Roland Staud; Robert Hurley; Michael Robinson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  [Placebo and nocebo : How can they be used or avoided?]

Authors:  E Hansen; N Zech; K Meissner
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Pain and the context.

Authors:  Elisa Carlino; Elisa Frisaldi; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  How placebos change the patient's brain.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Elisa Carlino; Antonella Pollo
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  The genetic mediation of individual differences in sensitivity to pain and its inhibition.

Authors:  J S Mogil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of dezocine and morphine for post-operative pain relief.

Authors:  S K Pandit; S P Kothary; U A Pandit; N R Kunz
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.