Literature DB >> 25729232

A study of promethazine hydrochloride and pentazocine intramuscular sedation along with 2 % lidocaine hydrochloride and adrenaline and comparison to placebo along with 2 % lidocaine hydrochloride and adrenaline for surgical extraction of mandibular third molar.

F Lalfamkima1, Subhas Chandra Debnath2, A K Adhyapok1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The main objective is to study and compare the sedative and analgesic effects of intramuscular injection fortwin-phenergan along with local anesthetic and normal saline placebo along with local anesthetics in mandibular third molar surgery. We also assessed and compared the postoperative experience of the patient in relation to the pain intensity, time to first analgesic taken and total number of analgesics consumed over a period of 48 h in the two groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who came to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Regional Dental College; with complaints regarding mandibular third molar were chosen for the treatment. Patients were evaluated using Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) and those patients having a score of CDAS 13 and above were selected. Sixty patients were selected out of which 30 patients formed group 1 and another 30 patients group 2. The patients were randomly divided with flip method into group 1 (study group) and or group 2 (controlled group).
RESULTS: Our study results showed that the operating conditions for both the groups at the end of surgery were similar without significant difference. Most of the surgical procedures were graded as excellent and good in both the groups except that difficulty was encountered in two patients from group 1 and one from group 2.
CONCLUSION: It could be concluded that particular drugs do not have much influence on the surgical procedure in our study, but it was found that patients from group 1 were more cooperative as compared to group 2 when difficulty was encountered during the surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS); Ramsey sedation score (RSS); Visual analogue scale (VAS)

Year:  2013        PMID: 25729232      PMCID: PMC4339336          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0595-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  29 in total

1.  PENTAZOCINE AS AN ANALGESIC. CLINICAL EVALUATION.

Authors:  L J CASS; W S FREDERIK; J V TEODORO
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Oral sedation: a primer on anxiolysis for the adult patient.

Authors:  Mark Donaldson; Gino Gizzarelli; Brian Chanpong
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2007

3.  Post discharge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory laparoscopy is not reduced by promethazine prophylaxis.

Authors:  J L Parlow; A T Meikle; J van Vlymen; N Avery
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: developing and using illustrated patient simulations to collect the data.

Authors:  D Gould; D Kelly; L Goldstone; J Gammon
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Improved sedation for oral surgery by combining nitrous oxide and intravenous Midazolam: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  G R Venchard; P J Thomson; R Boys
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 7.  Overt versus covert treatment for pain, anxiety, and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Leonardo Lopiano; Michele Lanotte; Fabrizio Benedetti
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Analgesic responses to morphine and placebo in individuals with postoperative pain.

Authors:  J D Levine; N C Gordon; R Smith; H L Fields
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Evaluation of two antiemetic agents during outpatient gynaecological surgery.

Authors:  L N Yaddanapudi
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Italian version of Corah's Dental Anxiety Scale: normative data in patients undergoing oral surgery and relationship with the ASA physical status classification.

Authors:  Enrico Facco; Gastone Zanette; Giovanni Manani
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.