Literature DB >> 7271230

Confrontation visual field techniques in the detection of anterior visual pathway lesions.

J D Trobe, P C Acosta, J P Krischer, G L Trick.   

Abstract

The accuracy of a variety of finger and color confrontation tests in identifying chiasmal and optic nerve visual field defects was assessed in patients whose field defects had been established beforehand by a conventional achromatic kinetic technique on the Goldmann perimeter. Kinetic and static finger confrontation methods identified an average of 42% of the 28 chiasmal hemianopic defects. False negatives included eyes with hemianopias complete to the largest (V4e) Goldmann isopter. False positives (average, 15%) occurred in eyes containing nerve fiber bundle defects with borders that fell near the vertical fixational meridian. Kinetic and static color confrontation techniques were 78.6% sensitive to hemianopias. Accuracy did not differ significantly whether the red target was presented kinetically or statically against the tangent screen, projected on the Autoplot screen, or held in the examiner's hand without attention to background. False positives (average, 23%) were slightly greater than with finger confrontation methods and occurred not only in eyes with nerve fiber bundle defects but also in eyes with no defects in reference visual fields. Finger confrontation identified 11% or fewer of optic nerve field defects, while some color techniques detected as many as 31 1/3%. There were no false positives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7271230     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410100105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  9 in total

1.  Use of a portable head mounted perimetry system to assess bedside visual fields.

Authors:  D A Hollander; N J Volpe; M L Moster; G T Liu; L J Balcer; K D Judy; S L Galetta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Rate of progression and severity of neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of cavernous sinus meningiomas.

Authors:  K C Golnik; N R Miller; D M Long
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1992

3.  Red-dot card test of the paracentral field as a screening test for optic nerve disease in onchocerciasis.

Authors:  I Murdoch; B R Jones; O E Babalola; S N Cousens; I Bolarin; A Abiose
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry.

Authors:  L N Johnson; F G Baloh
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  The four-meter confrontation visual field test.

Authors:  S R Kodsi; B R Younge
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1992

Review 6.  Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  Sachin Kedar; Deepta Ghate; James J Corbett
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Inpatient and Emergency Room Ophthalmology Consultations at a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Daniel J Oh; Levi N Kanu; Judy L Chen; Ahmad A Aref; William F Mieler; Peter W MacIntosh
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  The Assessment of Visual Fields in Infants Using Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP): A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Antonios Perperidis; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Ian C Murray; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns; Andrew J Tatham
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Deficits in multiple object-tracking and visual attention following mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Mohammed M Alnawmasi; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.