Literature DB >> 7252814

Statistical simulation study of new proposed uniformity requirement for bioequivalency studies.

J D Haynes.   

Abstract

The results of a statistical simulation study of the FDA-proposed 75/75 requirement for some bioequivalency studies are presented. The study used test drug products with the same true average bioavailability as the corresponding reference drug products but with various degrees of uniformity as measured by the coefficient of variation. The performance of the 75/75 requirement indicated that the probability of the test product passing was greater if both products had identical small coefficients of variation than if both had identical large coefficients of variation. Moreover, a test product compared to a reference product with equal variability had less probability of acceptance than an equally variable test product for another drug for which the reference product had less variability. Both results indicate that the 75/75 requirement should be withdrawn. An alternate uniformly most powerful, unbiased test, the Pitman-Morgan F test, is presented.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7252814     DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600700625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  8 in total

1.  Subject-by-formulation interaction in bioequivalence: conceptual and statistical issues. FDA Population/Individual Bioequivalence Working Group. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  W W Hauck; T Hyslop; M L Chen; R Patnaik; R L Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  In Vitro-in Vivo Correlation: An Unrealistic Problem.

Authors:  R Hüttenrauch; P Speiser
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Consideration of individual bioequivalence.

Authors:  S Anderson; W W Hauck
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-06

Review 4.  Review of methods and criteria for the evaluation of bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  G Pabst; H Jaeger
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Assessment of variance in bioavailability studies: comments on the article by McNamara et al.

Authors:  C M Metzler
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Reply to "Assessment of Variance in Bioavailability Studies: comments on the article by McNamara et al." by Carl M. Metzler.

Authors:  J P Skelly; V P Shah; D J Schuirmann
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  An assessment of the 4-6-20 rule for acceptance of analytical runs in bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  R O Kringle
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Influence of tablet dissolution on furosemide bioavailability: a bioequivalence study.

Authors:  P J McNamara; T S Foster; G A Digenis; R B Patel; W A Craig; P G Welling; R S Rapaka; V K Prasad; V P Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.200

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.