Literature DB >> 7247368

Development and validation of a neutralizer system for in vitro evaluation of some antiseptics.

W Sheikh.   

Abstract

A neutralizer system was developed and validated for use in the in vitro bactericidal evaluation of three commonly used antiseptics, namely, Hibiclens (4% [wt/vol] chlorhexidine gluconate), Betadine (7.5% [wt/vol] povidone-iodine), and pHisoHex (3% [wt/vol] hexachlorophene). The neutralizer finally selected after a screening of 12 potential candidates consisted of 3% Asolectin, 10% Tween 80, and 0.3% sodium thiosulfate in the recovery agar. This neutralizer system was tested and validated for its neutralizing capacity for the three antiseptics, as well as for its lack of inherent bactericidal action against Staphylococcus aureus and a number of gram-negative bacteria of clinical significance, With no more than a 10-fold dilution of the antiseptic, the selected neutralizer system was 100% effective in neutralizing all the bacteriostatic carry-over of the three antiseptics and was also completely without any inherent bactericidal action against all the test organisms used. Sodium sulfite (considered to be a potential inactivator for iodophores such as Betadine), even in concentrations as low as 0.1%, was found to be ineffective or inherently bactericidal, whereas 0.3% sodium thiosulfate, in combination with Asolectin and Tween 80, was adequate (effective as well as non-bactericidal) and was considered to be essential for the neutralization of the three test antiseptics, namely, Hibiclens, Betadine, and pHisoHex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7247368      PMCID: PMC181449          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.19.3.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  1:6-Di-4'-chlorophenyldiguanidohexane (hibitane); laboratory investigation of a new antibacterial agent of high potency.

Authors:  G E DAVIES; J FRANCIS; A R MARTIN; F L ROSE; G SWAIN
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1954-06

2.  Iodine as an antiseptic.

Authors:  L GERSHENFELD; B WITLIN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1950-08       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Factors influencing the activity of antimicrobial agents: an appraisal.

Authors:  A D Russell
Journal:  Microbios       Date:  1974-04

4.  Iodine inactivating agent in surgical scrub testing.

Authors:  A Gross; L Cofone; M B Huff
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-02

5.  Growth inhibition of staphylococci by sodium thiosulphate.

Authors:  A Kayser; G van der Ploeg
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1965-08

6.  The use of sodium sulfite as a neutralizer for evaluating povidone-iodine preparations.

Authors:  B L Green; W Litsky
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1974-07

7.  The use of inactivators in the evaluation of disinfectants.

Authors:  I H MacKinnon
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1974-10
  7 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Methodology for recovery of chemically treated Staphylococcus aureus with neutralizing medium.

Authors:  B P Dey; F B Engley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  In Vitro Evaluation of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine against Outbreak and Nonoutbreak Strains of Mycobacterium abscessus Using Standard Quantitative Suspension and Carrier Testing.

Authors:  Aristine Cheng; Hsin-Yun Sun; Yi-Tzu Tsai; Un-In Wu; Yu-Chung Chuang; Jann-Tay Wang; Wang-Huei Sheng; Po-Ren Hsueh; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Chlorhexidine resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or just an elevated MIC? An in vitro and in vivo assessment.

Authors:  B D Cookson; M C Bolton; J H Platt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prospective study of microbial colonization of the nose and skin and infection of the vascular access site in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  L G Kaplowitz; J A Comstock; D M Landwehr; H P Dalton; C G Mayhall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Prevention of drug carryover effects in studies assessing antimycobacterial efficacy of TMC207.

Authors:  Nacer Lounis; Tom Gevers; Joke Van Den Berg; Tom Verhaeghe; Rolf van Heeswijk; Koen Andries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Efficacy of two distinct ethanol-based hand rubs for surgical hand disinfection -- a controlled trial according to prEN 12791.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Christiane Ostermeyer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Insufficient neutralization in testing a chlorhexidine-containing ethanol-based hand rub can result in a false positive efficacy assessment.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Marc Shaffer; Corrine Hunte
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Does human saliva decrease the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine against oral bacteria?

Authors:  Thaer Abouassi; Christian Hannig; Katja Mahncke; Lamprini Karygianni; Martin Wolkewitz; Elmar Hellwig; Ali Al-Ahmad
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.