Literature DB >> 7240731

The importance of soap selection for routine hand hygiene in hospital.

J Ojajärvi.   

Abstract

Five different types of liquid soap were studied in hospital wards, each during two months' use. Altogether 1306 finger print samples were taken from the hands of the staff by sampling twice a week and the acceptability of the soaps was measured by a questionnaire. During the use of different soaps only slight differences were found in the numbers of total bacteria or in the occurrence of Staph. aureus and gram-negative bacilli on the hands. During the use of the emulsion-type product studied, several persons who had dermatological problems had lower mean bacterial counts of the fingers than during the use of the other soaps. This soap was also favourably accepted by the staff. After over one year's use of pine oil soap and alcohol, the staff of the hospital was satisfied with the method. However, several persons with skin problems admitted to not using soap or alcohol. The considerable differences found in the acceptability of soaps imply that for use in hospital the choice of a soap acceptable to the nursing staff is important in promoting proper hand hygiene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7240731      PMCID: PMC2133984          DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400069023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)        ISSN: 0022-1724


  9 in total

1.  DISINFECTION OF HANDS: REMOVAL OF TRANSIENT ORGANISMS.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-07-25

2.  THE INTERMITTENT USE OF HEXACHLOROPHENE SOAP--A CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors:  J A WEATHERALL; H I WINNER
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1963-12

3.  LACK OF EFFECT OF TWO HEXACHLOROPHENE-CONTAINING SOAPS UNDER NORMAL HOSPITAL WORKING CONDITIONS.

Authors:  C R MACPHERSON; M F SPARKMAN; D R WHITNEY
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Antibacterial effectiveness of routine hand washing.

Authors:  K Sprunt; W Redman; G Leidy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  How good are hand washing practices?

Authors:  M K Fox; S B Langner; R W Wells
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.220

6.  Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin.

Authors:  G A Ayliffe; K Bridges; H A Lilly; E J Lowbury; J Varney; M D Wilkins
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1975-10

7.  An evaluation of handwashing techniques-2.

Authors:  L J Taylor
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1978-01-19

8.  Failure of hand disinfection with frequent hand washing: a need for prolonged field studies.

Authors:  J Ojajärvi; P Mäkelä; I Rantasalo
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1977-08

9.  Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing.

Authors:  J Ojajärvi
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1980-10
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Efficacy of alcohol-based hand rinses under frequent-use conditions.

Authors:  E L Larson; P I Eke; B E Laughon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Antiseptic technology: access, affordability, and acceptance.

Authors:  J M Boyce
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.