Literature DB >> 7240561

Production of bite-block vowels: acoustic equivalence by selective compensation.

T Gay, B Lindblom, J Lubker.   

Abstract

Acoustic and articulatory data are reported for steady state vowels produced both normally and with a bite block. The formant patterns of the bite-block vowels were found to approximate those of the naturally spoken vowels. Measurements derived from lateral view still x-ray films showed that the bite blocks induce drastic articulatory reorganization. Using a mandibular frame of reference, we found that speakers compensated for a large bite block by using supershapes of the tongue and the lips (for [u] and [o]). Comparing the two productions using a maxillary frame of reference, we noted that compensation was maximum at the points of maximum constriction and incomplete or partial at points where the vocal-tract area was large. A computer simulation of our speakers' compensatory strategy revealed that they behaved optimally according to acoustic theory. These findings suggest that a vowel target is coded neurophysiologically in terms of acoustically significant area-function, specifically, by information related to cavity configuration at points of maximum constriction.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7240561     DOI: 10.1121/1.385591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech.

Authors:  Elisa Golfinopoulos; Jason A Tourville; Jason W Bohland; Satrajit S Ghosh; Alfonso Nieto-Castanon; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The integration of large-scale neural network modeling and functional brain imaging in speech motor control.

Authors:  E Golfinopoulos; J A Tourville; F H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Associations between tongue movement pattern consistency and formant movement pattern consistency in response to speech behavioral modifications.

Authors:  Antje S Mefferd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Quick compensatory mechanisms for tongue posture stabilization during speech production.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Andrew Szabados; Jean-Loup Caillet; Pascal Perrier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.

Authors:  Jean-François Patri; David J Ostry; Julien Diard; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Pamela Trudeau-Fisette; Christophe Savariaux; Pascal Perrier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  THE INFLUENCE OF LEXICAL FACTORS ON VOWEL DISTINCTIVENESS: EFFECTS OF JAW POSITIONING.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Nancy Pearl Solomon
Journal:  Int J Orofacial Myology       Date:  2016-11

8.  Reflections on mirror neurons and speech perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Gregory S Hickok; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The Effect of Jaw Position on Perceptual and Acoustic Characteristics of Speech.

Authors:  Nancy Pearl Solomon; Matthew J Makashay; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  Int J Orofacial Myology       Date:  2016-11

10.  Mapping typical and hypokinetic dysarthric speech production network using a connected speech paradigm in functional MRI.

Authors:  Shalini Narayana; Megan B Parsons; Wei Zhang; Crystal Franklin; Katherine Schiller; Asim F Choudhri; Peter T Fox; Mark S LeDoux; Michael Cannito
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.