Literature DB >> 32432505

Quick compensatory mechanisms for tongue posture stabilization during speech production.

Takayuki Ito1,2, Andrew Szabados1, Jean-Loup Caillet1, Pascal Perrier1.   

Abstract

The human tongue is atypical as a motor system since its movement is determined by deforming its soft tissues via muscles that are in large part embedded in it (muscular hydrostats). However, the neurophysiological mechanisms enabling fine tongue motor control are not well understood. We investigated sensorimotor control mechanisms of the tongue through a perturbation experiment. A mechanical perturbation was applied to the tongue during the articulation of three vowels (/i/, /e/, /ε/) under conditions of voicing, whispering, and posturing. Tongue movements were measured at three surface locations in the sagittal plane using electromagnetic articulography. We found that the displacement induced by the external force was quickly compensated for. Individual sensors did not return to their original positions but went toward a position on the original tongue contour for that vowel. The amplitude of compensatory response at each tongue site varied systematically according to the articulatory condition. A mathematical simulation that included reflex mechanisms suggested that the observed compensatory response can be attributed to a reflex mechanism, rather than passive tissue properties. The results provide evidence for the existence of quick compensatory mechanisms in the tongue that may be dependent on tunable reflexes. The tongue posture for vowels could be regulated in relation to the shape of the tongue contour, rather than to specific positions for individual tissue points.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study presents evidence of quick compensatory mechanisms in tongue motor control for speech production. The tongue posture is controlled not in relation to a specific tongue position, but to the shape of the tongue contour to achieve specific speech sounds. Modulation of compensatory responses due to task demands and mathematical simulations support the idea that the quick compensatory response is driven by a reflex mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compensatory response; mechanical perturbation; orosensory feedback; reflex; speech motor control

Year:  2020        PMID: 32432505      PMCID: PMC7311715          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00756.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Fibre composition of human intrinsic tongue muscles.

Authors:  P Stål; S Marklund; L-E Thornell; R De Paul; P-O Eriksson
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.481

2.  Fast force-generation dynamics of human articulatory muscles.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Emi Z Murano; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-02-27

3.  The Haskins optically corrected ultrasound system (HOCUS).

Authors:  D H Whalen; Khalil Iskarous; Mark K Tiede; David J Ostry; Heike Lehnert-Lehouillier; Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson; Donald S Hailey
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance.

Authors:  E Burdet; R Osu; D W Franklin; T E Milner; M Kawato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  3D tongue motion from tagged and cine MR images.

Authors:  Fangxu Xing; Jonghye Woo; Emi Z Murano; Junghoon Lee; Maureen Stone; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

6.  Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Determination of the frequency response of isometric soleus muscle in the cat using random nerve stimulation.

Authors:  A Mannard; R B Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Motor control of serial ordering of speech.

Authors:  P F MacNeilage
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Production of bite-block vowels: acoustic equivalence by selective compensation.

Authors:  T Gay; B Lindblom; J Lubker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Lip muscle reflex and intentional response levels in a simple speech task.

Authors:  M D McClean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contribution of sensory memory to speech motor learning.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Jiachuan Bai; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.