Literature DB >> 7236350

Conditioned inhibition of the nictitating membrane response in decorticate rabbits.

J W Moore, C H Yeo, D A Oakley, I S Russell.   

Abstract

Rabbits with substantial neocortical ablation were trained in a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition task using a light as the reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS) and the same light compounded with a tone as the non-reinforced CS. The conditioned response was the nictitating membrane response, and the unconditioned stimulus was paraorbital shock. Training began 4-14 months postoperatively. With a number of procedural variations across 4 experiments, there was little evidence of impaired conditioned inhibition by decorticates compared to control animals. These results are consistent with earlier reports on Pavlovian discrimination learning and reversal involving single-element CSs from different sense modalities. Hence, they extend the basic conclusion that neocortex is not essential for Pavlovian inhibition to the conditioned inhibition paradigm. Consideration of these findings in the light of previous investigations of conditioned inhibition in rabbits, involving mesencephalic or hippocampal lesions, supports the hypothesis that the crucial neural elements for Pavlovian inhibition may be located in the brain stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7236350     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(80)90037-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  8 in total

1.  Conditioned inhibition in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  John T Green; Amy C Chess; Cynthia J Conquest; Brittney A Yegla
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Perirhinal cortex lesions impair feature-negative discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Selective attention and Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Ian Steele-Russell; M I Russell; J A Castiglioni; J A Reuter; M W van Hof
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Aldis P Weible; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Purkinje cell loss by OX7-saporin impairs excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Hunter E Halverson; Amy Poremba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Blockade of GABAA receptors in the interpositus nucleus modulates expression of conditioned excitation but not conditioned inhibition of the eyeblink response.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec

8.  Dorsolateral pontine tegmentum and the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: analysis of CR-related single-unit activity.

Authors:  J E Desmond; J W Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.