Literature DB >> 7235097

High and low surgical rates: risk factors for area residents.

N P Roos, L L Roos.   

Abstract

Patterns of surgical practice, the type of operations performed, and risk characteristics of elderly patients brought to surgery are examined in areas with differing surgical rates. This population-based analysis covering Manitoba's 56 rural hospital areas uses discharge claims filed routinely with the provincial Health Services Commission. One and a half times as much surgery was performed in high rate areas (115.2 procedures per 1,000 elderly) as in low rate areas (74.7 procedures/1,000). Since surgical case mix varied little between high and low rate areas, the rate variation means that place of residence strongly influences exposure to major surgical procedures. In similar fashion, the proportion of surgical cases classified as high-risk does not vary with the surgical rate. High risk patients resident in high surgical rate areas are more likely to come to surgery than are their counterparts in low rate areas. Further analyses of nonsurgical hospitalization, of three common elective procedures, and of area characteristics were carried out. The surgical selection process, not characteristics of the population residing in the area, appears to determine the rate at which high and low risk patients come to surgery. Our research clearly suggests that high surgical rates carry with them the risk of excess surgical deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7235097      PMCID: PMC1619829          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.6.591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  26 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of the PSRO hospital review system.

Authors:  M J Goran
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Variations in surgery in Ontario.

Authors:  H Stockwell; E Vayda
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Hospital caseloads in Liverpool, New England, and Uppsala. An international comparison.

Authors:  R J Pearson; B Smedby; R Berfenstam; R F Logan; A M Burgess; O L Peterson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1968-09-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  A comparison of surgical rates in Canada and in England and Wales.

Authors:  E Vayda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Surgical work loads in a community practice.

Authors:  E F Hughes; V R Fuchs; J E Jacoby; E M Lewit
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Institutional differences in Postoperative death rates. Commentary on some of the findings of the National Halothane Study.

Authors:  L E Moses; F Mosteller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A proposed hospital quality index: hospital death rates adjusted for case severity.

Authors:  M I Roemer; A T Moustafa; C E Hopkins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Surgical manpower. A comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales.

Authors:  J P Bunker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Operation in the aged. Mortality related to concurrent disease, duration of anesthesia, and elective or emergency operation.

Authors:  C L Cogbill
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1967-02

10.  Variations in the incidence of surgery.

Authors:  C E Lewis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  22 in total

1.  A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D L Harper; A Shah; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Rural hospitals: a literature synthesis and health services research agenda.

Authors:  I S Moscovice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Small-area variations: what are they and what do they mean? Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Micro-area variation in hospital use.

Authors:  P J Tedeschi; R A Wolfe; J R Griffith
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Utilization management: a medical responsibility.

Authors:  A L Linton; D K Peachey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Software for health care analysts: a modular approach.

Authors:  L L Roos; A Wajda; S M Sharp; J P Nicol
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Geographic variations in elderly hospital and surgical discharge rates, New York State.

Authors:  B Pasley; P Vernon; G Gibson; M McCauley; J Andoh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Small area statistics: large statistical problems.

Authors:  P Diehr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Effect of nonmedical factors on family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

Authors:  G R Langley; A M MacLellan; H J Sutherland; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.