Literature DB >> 7232475

Disruption of autoshaped responding to a single of brain-stimulation reward by neuroleptic drugs.

A G Phillips, A C McDonald, D M Wilkie.   

Abstract

Repeated pairing of the onset of a stationary light (CS) that signalled electrical stimulation of brain-stimulation reward sites in the mesencephalon (US) resulted in autoshaped approach behavior to the CS. After acquisition of approach to the CS two groups of rats were injected with either pimozide (0.15, 0.50, or 1.0 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.05, 0.10, or 0.15 mg/kg) prior to test sessions consisting of 30 CS-US pairings. Both neuroleptic drugs caused a significant dose-related attenuation of the autoshaped CS-approach. A within-session analysis of responding after treatment with the high dose of each drug indicated that most responses occurred in the first 10 trials, a result that appears to rule out a direct effect of the drugs on sensory processes and orientation. The effect of repeated testing with pimozide (1.0 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.15 mg/kg) was compared to three sessions with CS alone (extinction). Autoshaped CS-approaches declined gradually over the three extinction sessions, in contrast to the immediate and sustained disruption of approaching during the three drug sessions. These data suggest that neuroleptic-induced suppression of autoshaped CS-approach with brain-stimulation reward cannot be attributed solely to a block of reward processes. It is suggested that neuroleptic drugs disrupt neural mechanisms by which signals of impending reward release pre-organized response patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7232475     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90315-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  The effects of haloperidol on the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): implications for neuroleptic drug action on reinforcement and nonreinforcement.

Authors:  J Feldon; Y Katz; I Weiner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Facilitation of latent inhibition by haloperidol in rats.

Authors:  I Weiner; J Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian-conditioned responses.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Disruption of conditioned reward association by typical and atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  C L Danna; G I Elmer
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Vedran Lovic; Benjamin T Saunders; Lindsay M Yager; Shelly B Flagel; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.