Literature DB >> 7229203

Perceptual assessment of fricative--stop coarticulation.

B H Repp, V A Mann.   

Abstract

The perceptual dependence of stop consonants on preceding fricatives [Mann and Repp, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 548--558 (1981)] was further investigated in two experiments employing both natural and synthetic speech. These experiments consistently replicated our original finding that listeners, report velar stops following [s]. In addition, our data confirmed earlier reports that natural fricative noises (excerpted from utterances of [st alpha], [sk alpha], [(formula: see text)k alpha]) contain cues to the following stop consonants; this was revealed in subjects' identifications of stops from isolated fricative noises and from stimuli consisting of these noises followed by synthetic CV portions drawn from a [t alpha]--[k alpha] continuum. However, these cues in the noise portion could not account for the contextual effect of fricative identity ([formula: see text] versus [sp) on stop perception (more "k" responses following [s]). Rather, this effect seems to be related to a coarticulatory influence of a preceding fricative on stop production; Subjects' responses to excised natural CV portions (with bursts and aspiration removed) were biased towards a relatively more forward place of stop articulation when the CVs had originally been preceded by [s]; and the identification of a preceding ambiguous fricative was biased in the direction of the original fricative context in which a given CV portion had been produced. These findings support an articulatory explanation for the effect of preceding fricatives on stop consonant perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7229203     DOI: 10.1121/1.385695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: biological invariance and modality specificity.

Authors:  Cheryl M Capek; Giordana Grossi; Aaron J Newman; Susan L McBurney; David Corina; Brigitte Roeder; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Detecting anticipatory effects in speech articulation by means of spectral coefficient analyses.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Grace J Hao; Steve A Xue; Ludo Max
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  Sensorimotor adaptation affects perceptual compensation for coarticulation.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Srikantan Nagarajan; James M McQueen; John Houde
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

5.  Auditory and phonetic processes in place perception for stops.

Authors:  J R Sawusch; H C Nusbaum
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-12

6.  Bidirectional contrast effects in the perception of VC-CV sequences.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

7.  Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception.

Authors:  C T Best; B Morrongiello; R Robson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-03

8.  A psychophysical imaging method evidencing auditory cue extraction during speech perception: a group analysis of auditory classification images.

Authors:  Léo Varnet; Kenneth Knoblauch; Willy Serniclaes; Fanny Meunier; Michel Hoen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.