Literature DB >> 7226104

Second-look laparotomy based on CEA elevations in colorectal cancer.

F F Attiyeh, M W Stearns.   

Abstract

Second-look laparotomy was performed in 32 patients who had significant CEA elevations following curative resection for adenocarcinoma of the large bowel. All were asymptomatic, with no demonstrable evidence of recurrence on work-up prior to surgery. Five patients developed subsequent CEA elevations after curative resections at second-look surgery and, while remaining asymptomatic, underwent re-exploration. A total of 37 laparotomies were performed. The CEA level at second-look ranged from 5.1--470 ng/ml with a median level of 25 ng/ml, the time delay ranged from 1--20 months with a median of four months, and the rate of CEA elevation ranged from 0.39--49.05 ng/ml in two weeks with a median of 3.17 ng/ml in two weeks. Recurrent disease was documented in 33 (89%) and four patients had negative explorations (11%). Liver metastasis was evident in 18 with seven curative resections, and local-abdominal disease in 15 with nine curative resections, giving a resectability rate of 43% (16/37). Lower CEA levels, shorter time delays to surgery, and slower rates of CEA elevation were directly related to the resectability rate. The follow-up ranged from 2--61 months, with a median of 15 months. Eight patients are alive and well, 8--61 months, 10 patients are alive with disease 10--47 months; and 14 patients are dead of disease 2--37 months following the second-look surgery. These results suggest a definite role for CEA in selecting patients for second-look laparotomy; however, more follow-up is necessary to document prolonged survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7226104     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2119::aid-cncr2820470903>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  Symposium: The management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F F Attiyeh; H Ellis; M Killingback; G D Oates; P F Schofield; H J Staab; G Steele; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The use and potential of serum tumour markers, new and old.

Authors:  S E Bates
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The role of CEA, TPA and CA 19-9 in the early detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P Barillari; G Ramacciato; R de Angelis; P Gozzo; P Aurello; M Indinnimeo; S Valabrega; F D'Angelo; G Fegiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with "curative" surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Carcinoembryonic antigen and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Northover
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L D Leffall
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  The follow-up of patients after definitive resections for large bowel cancer.

Authors:  W E Enker; R G Kramer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A prospective evaluation of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the management of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J Boey; H C Cheung; C K Lai; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Follow-up plans after treatment of primary colon and rectum cancer.

Authors:  G Steele
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  [Effect of serial CEA determination on diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of recurrent colorectal cancer].

Authors:  B Mentges
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.