Literature DB >> 1949855

Follow-up plans after treatment of primary colon and rectum cancer.

G Steele1.   

Abstract

Although some would argue about the value of routine follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer, well designed programs of testing have been shown to identify treatable recurrence at its earliest detectable stage. Treatment of these recurrences appears to be associated with improved survival. Newer applications of radiolabeled antibodies that are directed to specific or nonspecific cell surface epitopes may increase the value of serologic tumor markers. Ultimately, the application of progressively more stringent cost controls in our medical care delivery systems will demand that follow-up tests be proven of value either in a curative or palliative sense to the patient with recurrent disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1949855     DOI: 10.1007/bf01789202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  41 in total

1.  A summary of thirteen years' experience with the second look program.

Authors:  V A GILBERTSEN; O H WANGENSTEEN
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1962-04

2.  Areas of failure found at reoperation (second or symptomatic look) following "curative surgery" for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Clinicopathologic correlation and implications for adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  L L Gunderson; H Sosin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Recurrent colorectal carcinoma: detection, treatment, and other considerations.

Authors:  H C Polk; J S Spratt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Biochemical monitoring of cancer. A review.

Authors:  A M Neville; E H Cooper
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.057

5.  Surgery for recurrent colorectal carcinoma--is it worthwhile?

Authors:  S G Pollard; R Macfarlane; W G Everett
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Assessment of serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays in postoperative detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; N Zamcheck; F D Moore
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a prognostic and monitoring test in clinically complete resection of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  M A Herrera; T M Chu; E D Holyoke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Cost effectiveness of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R S Sandler; D A Freund; C A Herbst; D P Sandler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  R M Olson; N P Perencevich; A W Malcolm; J T Chaffey; R E Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Analysis of recurrence patterns following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  A W Malcolm; N P Perencevich; R M Olson; J A Hanley; J T Chaffey; R E Wilson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  Clinicopathologic factors affecting recurrence after curative surgery for stage I colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Min Ae Keum; Seok-Byung Lim; Sun A Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02-29

2.  Follow-up result afters negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer.

Authors:  Joon Seok Lim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim; Jin-Sub Choi; Joo Hee Kim; Young Taik Oh; Won Ho Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo De Sanctis; Giovanni Lezoche; Paolo Massucco; Massimo Summa; Rosaria Gesuita; Lorenzo Capussotti; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Staging of squamous esophageal cancer: accuracy and value.

Authors:  A H Hölscher; H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Post-treatment management options for patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  K S Virgo; L W McKirgan; M C Caputo; D M Mahurin; L C Chao; N A Caputo; K S Naunheim; M W Flye; K N Gillespie; F E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  D J Bruinvels; A M Stiggelbout; J Kievit; H C van Houwelingen; J D Habbema; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes A colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Matthias W Wichmann; Christian Müller; Hans M Hornung; Ulla Lau-Werner; Friedrich-Wilhelm Schildberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Surveillance after curative colon cancer resection: practice patterns of surgical subspecialists.

Authors:  K S Virgo; T P Wade; W E Longo; M A Coplin; A M Vernava; F E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest x-ray, and colonoscopy.

Authors:  R A Graham; S Wang; P J Catalano; D G Haller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.