Literature DB >> 7225463

Does quantitative tRNA adaptation to codon content in mRNA optimize the ribosomal translation efficiency? Proposal for a translation system model.

G Chavancy, J P Garel.   

Abstract

Neither a dynamic nor an energetic approach of the translation process has taken into account that intracellular levels of iso-tRNA species are adapted or adjusted to the codon frequency of mRNA being decoded (Bombyx mori silk gland, rabbit reticulocyte). A critical study of available experimental data suggests that the average elongation rate of a protein is maximized in the presence of an adapted tRNA population, usually an homologous tRNA. In addition, the amount of synthesized protein parallels that of corresponding mRNA. Other evidences--including in vitro and in vivo elongation assays with fibroin mRNA--show that individual elongation rates are not uniform. Pauses occur at certain sites of the mRNA chain. The relative lifetime of these pauses depends on the tRNA pool used. Finally, it appears that translation accuracy also depends on the balanced tRNA population. We propose to explain these different effects by using a codon-anticodon recognition model, called "trial and error system" based on a stochastic processing of the ribosome. Accordingly, various acylated tRNA species which surround a ribosome randomly encounter the receptor A site. Every trapped tRNA species is tested for a proper pairing with the codon to be recognized at the level of a comparator or discriminator function. If the pairing is correct, transpeptidation becomes irreversible. If not, the aminoacyl-tRNA is rejected and another randomly trapped tRNA is processed in turn. Mathematical analysis of this model shows that the mean number of trials used for translating the whole sequence of a mRNA is minimized when the proportion of different iso-tRNA species is correlated with the square root of codon frequency. Quantitations of reticulocyte tRNA support such a parabolic relation. Our translation system model brings some light into the role of tRNA adaptation for optimizing translation efficiency, i.e. maximizing both speed and accuracy. Some consequences of the model are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7225463     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9084(81)80192-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochimie        ISSN: 0300-9084            Impact factor:   4.079


  10 in total

Review 1.  Protein folding.

Authors:  M A Basharov
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 2.  Switches in species-specific codon preferences: the influence of mutation biases.

Authors:  D C Shields
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms.

Authors:  S G Andersson; C G Kurland
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-06

4.  Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity.

Authors:  M Gouy; C Gautier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1982-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The tRNA cycle and its relation to the rate of protein synthesis.

Authors:  H Liljenström; G von Heijne; C Blomberg; J Johansson
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Mammalian mutation pressure, synonymous codon choice, and mRNA degradation.

Authors:  Jubao Duan; Marcos A Antezana
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Growth rate dependence of transfer RNA abundance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  V Emilsson; C G Kurland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  SHIFT: server for hidden stops analysis in frame-shifted translation.

Authors:  Arun Gupta; Tiratha Raj Singh
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-23

9.  Mapping codon usage of the translation initiation region in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus genome.

Authors:  Jun-hong Su; Xiao-xia Ma; Ya-li He; Ji-dong Li; Xu-sheng Ma; Yong-xi Dou; Xue-nong Luo; Xue-peng Cai
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.099

10.  Does codon composition influence ribosome function?

Authors:  S G Andersson; R H Buckingham; C G Kurland
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 11.598

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.