Literature DB >> 7220239

The double-nail illusion: experiments on binocular vision with nails, needles, and pins.

J D Krol, W A van de Grind.   

Abstract

When two nails or similar slender objects are held straight ahead at reading distance, one a few centimetres behind the other and aligned at the same eye level, they are seen side by side rather than one behind the other. A quantitative study of this 'double-nail' illusion shows that the objects are judged to be at the positions of the so-called apparent or ghost images known from fusional theories of stereopsis. Most recent fusional theories assume that apparent images are suppressed by neuronal interactions, and the usual absence of percepts corresponding with apparent images is often quoted as an argument against 'projection' theories of stereopsis. The double-nail illusion shows, however, that percepts which correspond with apparent images do occur. The results are interpreted in terms of a neuronal-network type of fusional theory, in which the interpretation that corresponds with the minimum overall disparity is assumed to dominate. The following parameters were varied in the experiments: length, width, colour, and contrast for each of the nails; and fixation point position; and the orientation of the nail carrier. The results show that identity of the stimuli is not a necessary condition for the illusion. A stable vergence can be enforced by the double-nail illusion, and with additional nails multistable states of vergence can be obtained.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7220239     DOI: 10.1068/p090651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

1.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Is correspondence search in human stereo vision a coarse-to-fine process?

Authors:  H A Mallot; S Gillner; P A Arndt
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Stereo and eye movement.

Authors:  D Geiger; A Yuille
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  A model of the visual localization of prey by frog and toad.

Authors:  D H House
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  The perception of stereoscopic transparency.

Authors:  R A Akerstrom; J T Todd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

6.  On the disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion.

Authors:  K Prazdny
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-01

7.  Detection of binocular disparities.

Authors:  K Prazdny
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Human stereovision without localized image features.

Authors:  P A Arndt; H A Mallot; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.