Literature DB >> 7218896

The validity of the medical record.

F J Romm, S M Putnam.   

Abstract

The medical record is the source of information for many purposes, including evaluation of the quality of care provided. Despite this reliance on the record, there have been few attempts to validate the recorded content against the verbal content of the interaction between patient and physician. In this study, we compared the record with verbatim transcripts of outpatient visits. Overall, 59 per cent of units of information present in either source were found in the record. Recording was more complete for the chief complaint (92 per cent) and information related to the patient's present illness (71 per cent) than for other medical history (29 per cent). Incomplete recording of elicited information may partially explain the often low levels of performance of recommended care items found in quality-of-care studies. We suggest that more attention be paid to improving communication about tests and therapies to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7218896     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  38 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data.

Authors:  J R Logan; P N Gorman; B Middleton
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Agreement between self-reported and routinely collected health-care utilization data among seniors.

Authors:  Parminder Raina; Vicki Torrance-Rynard; Micheline Wong; Christel Woodward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Reliability of the variables in a new set of models that predict outcome after stroke.

Authors:  N U Weir; C E Counsell; M McDowall; A Gunkel; M S Dennis
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  A study of admissions to paediatric beds.

Authors:  G Rajaratnam
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  J L Milchak; B L Carter; G Ardery; H R Black; G L Bakris; D W Jones; C D Kreiter
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Comparison of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring between nurses and residents.

Authors:  Nur Baykara; Kaan Gökduman; Tülay Hoşten; Mine Solak; Kamil Toker
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Clinician information activities in diverse ambulatory care practices.

Authors:  P C Tang; M A Jaworski; C A Fellencer; N Kreider; M P LaRosa; W C Marquardt
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Accuracy of data in computer-based patient records.

Authors:  W R Hogan; M M Wagner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Health state information derived from secondary databases is affected by multiple sources of bias.

Authors:  Darcey D Terris; David G Litaker; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Psychosocial problems in chronically ill children: physician concern, parent satisfaction, and the validity of medical records.

Authors:  R R Lau; H S Williams; L C Williams; J E Ware; R H Brook
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.