Literature DB >> 7214676

Operational sensitivity and acute resetting of aortic baroreceptors in dogs.

H M Coleridge, J C Coleridge, M P Kaufman, A Dangel.   

Abstract

Stimulus-response curves of aortic baroreceptors constructed by alternately increasing and decreasing pressure from a normal baseline or set-point differ from curves constructed by varying pressure in one direction only from an abnormally high or low pressure. In anesthetized dogs we recorded impulses from aortic baroreceptors with myelinated fibers, using a pressurized reservoir to control mean aortic blood pressure (MABP). After setting MABP to a baseline of 100 mm Hg (normal MABP in unanesthetized dogs), we constructed baroreceptor response curves by alternately decreasing MABP from 100 to 30 mm Hg, and increasing it from 100 to 180 mm Hg, in each case returning MABP to the baseline to obtain hysteresis loops. All baroreceptors were active at 100 mm Hg, their discharge averaging 15-16 impulses/sec. At all pressures above threshold, baroreceptors fired more when pressure was increasing than when pressure was decreasing. This hysteresis caused the steepest part of the response curve constructed in this manner to span the baseline value, demonstrating that, contrary to previous views, aortic baroreceptors signal decreases in pressure below the normal level, as well as increases above it. We also constructed response curves after holding MABP at a "hypertensive" baseline of 125 mm Hg for 20 minutes. "Hypertensive" curves demonstrated reversible resetting, shifting significantly to the right of "normotensive" curves so that baroreceptor threshold increased on average by 7 mm Hg (P less than 0.01). Both hysteresis and short-term resetting probably result from the viscoelastic behavior of wall elements with which baroreceptors are coupled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7214676     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.48.5.676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  20 in total

1.  Discharge characteristics and rapid resetting of autoactive aortic baroreceptors in rats.

Authors:  P A Munch
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Absence of early resetting of coronary baroreceptors in anaesthetized dogs.

Authors:  N C McMahon; M J Drinkhill; R Hainsworth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Baroreceptor responses derived from a fundamental concept.

Authors:  M F Taher; A B Cecchini; M A Allen; S R Gobran; R C Gorman; B L Guthrie; K A Lingenfelter; S Y Rabbany; P M Rolchigo; J Melbin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Characteristics of C fibre baroreceptors in the carotid sinus of dogs.

Authors:  H M Coleridge; J C Coleridge; H D Schultz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Acute baroreflex resetting and its control of blood pressure in an open loop model.

Authors:  W Tan; M J Panzenbeck; I H Zucker
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 6.  Mechanisms of complete baroreceptor resetting in hypertension.

Authors:  E M Krieger
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Rapid resetting of rabbit aortic baroreceptors and reflex heart rate responses by directional changes in blood pressure.

Authors:  S L Burke; P K Dorward; P I Korner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Indomethacin reduces acute baroreceptor resetting in the dog.

Authors:  W Wang; M Brändle; I H Zucker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Renal sympathetic baroreflex during normoxia and during hypoxia in conscious and in anesthetized rabbits.

Authors:  M Iriki; E Kozawa
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Aortic wall properties and baroreceptor behaviour at normal arterial pressure and in acute hypertensive resetting in dogs.

Authors:  H M Coleridge; J C Coleridge; E R Poore; A M Roberts; H D Schultz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.