Literature DB >> 7213948

Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals.

J L Kirschvink, J L Gould.   

Abstract

Bacteria, sharks, honey bees, and homing pigeons as well as other organisms seem to detect the direction of the earth's magnetic field. Indirect but reproducible evidence suggests that the bees and birds can also respond to very minute changes in its intensity. The mechanisms behind this sensitivity are not known. Naturally magnetic, biologically precipitated magnetite (Fe3O4) has been found in chitons, magnetotactic bacteria, honey bees, homing pigeons, and dolphins. Its mineralization in localized areas may be associated with the ability of these animals to respond to the direction and intensity of the earth's magnetic field. The presence of large numbers (approximately 10(8)) of superparamagnetic magnetite crystals in honey bees and similar numbers of single-domain magnetite grains in pigeons suggests that there may be at least two basic types of ferrimagnetic magnetoreceptive organelles. Theoretical calculations show that ferrimagnetic organs using either type of grain when integrated by the nervous system are capable of accounting for even the most extreme magnetic field sensitivities reported. Indirect evidence suggests that organic magnetite may be a common biological component, and may account for the results of numerous high field and electromagnetic experiments on animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7213948     DOI: 10.1016/0303-2647(81)90060-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  73 in total

1.  Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) use a magnetic compass for navigation.

Authors:  J A Etheredge; S M Perez; O R Taylor; R Jander
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds.

Authors:  T Ritz; S Adem; K Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Differential effects of magnetic pulses on the orientation of naturally migrating birds.

Authors:  Richard A Holland
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  A magnetic protein biocompass.

Authors:  Siying Qin; Hang Yin; Celi Yang; Yunfeng Dou; Zhongmin Liu; Peng Zhang; He Yu; Yulong Huang; Jing Feng; Junfeng Hao; Jia Hao; Lizong Deng; Xiyun Yan; Xiaoli Dong; Zhongxian Zhao; Taijiao Jiang; Hong-Wei Wang; Shu-Jin Luo; Can Xie
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 6.  Magnetic particle-mediated magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jeremy Shaw; Alastair Boyd; Michael House; Robert Woodward; Falko Mathes; Gary Cowin; Martin Saunders; Boris Baer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Magnetic pulse affects a putative magnetoreceptor mechanism.

Authors:  Alfonso F Davila; Michael Winklhofer; Valera P Shcherbakov; Nikolai Petersen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Magnetic orientation and magnetoreception in birds and other animals.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Effect of stress and magnetic field on the heart activity of the Greenland seal Pagophilus groenlandicus.

Authors:  G G Matishov; V M Muraveiko; A S Gladkikh; A V Muraveiko
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  Development of chick embryos in 1 Hz to 100 kHz magnetic fields.

Authors:  J Juutilainen; K Saali
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.