Literature DB >> 3763826

Development of chick embryos in 1 Hz to 100 kHz magnetic fields.

J Juutilainen, K Saali.   

Abstract

Chick embryos were exposed during their 48 first hours of development to sinusoidally oscillating magnetic fields. The frequencies 1 Hz, 10 Hz, 16.7 Hz, 30 Hz, 50 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz and 100 kHz, and the field strengths 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 A/m were used. Each exposure group consisted of 20 eggs. After the exposure, the embryos were examined for abnormalities and classified by the developmental stage. The percentage of abnormal embryos (%AE) was significantly increased at frequencies from 16.7 Hz to 100 kHz. Above a threshold field strength of about 0.1 to 1 A/m, %AE was rather independent of the field strength, varying from 16% to 56% in different exposure groups. 13% of the sham-exposed control embryos (n = 150) were abnormal. Only the 0.1 A/m exposure group differed significantly from the controls at 1 Hz, and no significant effect was found at 10 Hz. The developmental stage was in general not affected by the magnetic fields, but some abnormal embryos showed retarded development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3763826     DOI: 10.1007/bf01211737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  9 in total

1.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

2.  Pulse shape of magnetic fields influences chick embryogenesis.

Authors:  A Ubeda; J Leal; M A Trillo; M A Jimenez; J M Delgado
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Magnetic field sensitivity in animals.

Authors:  J L Gould
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 19.318

4.  Time-varying magnetic fields: effect on DNA synthesis.

Authors:  A R Liboff; T Williams; D M Strong; R Wistar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  W R Adey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Embryological changes induced by weak, extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  J M Delgado; J Leal; J L Monteagudo; M G Gracia
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Lack of effect of weak low frequency electromagnetic fields on chick embryogenesis.

Authors:  S Maffeo; M W Miller; E L Carstensen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field detection in animals.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink; J L Gould
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Effects of 100-Hz magnetic fields with various waveforms on the development of chick embryos.

Authors:  J Juutilainen; M Harri; K Saali; T Lahtinen
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.925

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Sublethal effect of a weak intermittent magnetic field on the development of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) tadpoles.

Authors:  M Severini; A M Dattilo; A De Gaetano
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Cardiovascular malformations and maternal exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen; K Kurppa; K Rantala
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Down-regulation of metallothionein 1 and 2 after exposure to electromagnetic field in mouse testis.

Authors:  Abbas Ebrahimi-Kalan; Mehryar Habibi Roudkenar; Raheleh Halabian; Peiman Broki Milan; Armin Zarrintan; Amaneh Mohammadi Roushandeh
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2011

4.  TENSCell: Imaging of Stretch-Activated Cells Reveals Divergent Nuclear Behavior and Tension.

Authors:  Benjamin Seelbinder; Adrienne K Scott; Isabel Nelson; Stephanie E Schneider; Kristin Calahan; Corey P Neu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Human adverse reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic field exposures: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  G M Shaw; L A Croen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.