Literature DB >> 7211329

The loudness of tinnitus.

P E Goodwin, R M Johnson.   

Abstract

Paradoxically, measurements of the loudness of tinnitus indicate that the noise is not a very loud one, yet many persons experiencing it report severe distress. It has been suggested that either loudness has not been measured correctly or that some other factor such as recruitment may be involved. These aspects were investigated, with the following results: (1) the loudness levels obtained for two methods of measuring the loudness of tinnitus differed significantly with the proposed method yielding measures of greater magnitude without exception; (2) recruitment was evidenced for all subjects. On the basis of the results the following conclusions seem justified: (1) the loudness of tinnitus may be more intense than previously reported; (2) the proposed method for measuring the loudness of tinnitus appears to be a more valid measurement than the traditional method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7211329     DOI: 10.3109/00016488009131736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  8 in total

1.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Changes over time of psychoacoustic outcome measurements are not a substitute for subjective outcome measurements in acute tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah Rabau; Tony Cox; Andrea Kleine Punte; Brecht Waelkens; Annick Gilles; Kristien Wouters; Sebastien Janssens de Varebeke; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Tinnitus with or without hearing loss: are its characteristics different?

Authors:  Marina Savastano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Brain regions responsible for tinnitus distress and loudness: a resting-state FMRI study.

Authors:  Takashi Ueyama; Tomohiro Donishi; Satoshi Ukai; Yorihiko Ikeda; Muneki Hotomi; Noboru Yamanaka; Kazuhiro Shinosaki; Masaki Terada; Yoshiki Kaneoke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.

Authors:  Grant D Searchfield
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Tinnitus in Normal-Hearing Participants after Exposure to Intense Low-Frequency Sound and in Ménière's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Margarete Anna Ueberfuhr; Lutz Wiegrebe; Eike Krause; Robert Gürkov; Markus Drexl
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Manipulation of Hearing Aid Gain and Tinnitus Relief: A Paired Comparison Study.

Authors:  Sindhu Parthasarathy; Hemanth Narayan Shetty
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.316

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.