Literature DB >> 7203882

Accommodation responses and refractive error.

R J Maddock, M Millodot, S Leat, C A Johnson.   

Abstract

Previous investigations have reported considerable individual differences in the resting point of accommodation. Recent independent studies in Davis, Calif., and Cardiff, Wales, indicate that part of these variations are related to refractive errors. The average dioptric value of the resting point of accommodation is lowest for corrected myopes, highest for corrected hyperopes, and intermediate for emmetropes. Another part of the variation in resting point is related to individual differences in the far point accommodation. There appears to be no significant relationship between the resting point and near point of accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7203882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  8 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Loreto Martínez-Almeida; Carlos Salas; Carolina Ortíz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; M G Wickham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Binocular dynamics of accommodation, convergence, and pupil size in myopes.

Authors:  Vahid Pourreza Ghoushchi; Juan Mompeán; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Instrument myopia conceptions, misconceptions, and influencing factors.

Authors:  M F Wesner; R J Miller
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03-31       Impact factor: 2.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.