Literature DB >> 3698796

Instrument myopia conceptions, misconceptions, and influencing factors.

M F Wesner, R J Miller.   

Abstract

The literature on instrument myopia is reviewed, with the review organized around three principal objectives. One is to describe and discuss various factors that may influence the degree to which instrument myopia is manifested, including monocular vs. binocular viewing, age, direction of focus, illumination level, fatigue, magnification, astigmatic variations, optical decentration, perceived proximity of the target and peripheral surround, and experience. The second objective is to discuss the intermediate resting state conception of accommodation, its application to instrument myopia, and its strengths and weaknesses as applied to the available literature. The third objective is to summarize the salient problems in the instrument myopia literature, and to present a set of recommendations for guiding future work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698796     DOI: 10.1007/bf00212652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  53 in total

1.  Infrared skiascopic measurements of refractive changes in dim illumination and in darkness.

Authors:  N B CHIN; R E HORN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1956-01

2.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Accommodation of the human eye in a bright and empty visual field.

Authors:  T C WHITESIDE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Accommodation function of the human eye.

Authors:  F M Toates
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Procedural effects on the manifest human amplitude of accommodation.

Authors:  R C Fitch
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1971-11

6.  The effect of contrast on sustained detection.

Authors:  J E Raymond; I M Lindblad; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The influence of the spatial distribution of a target on the dynamic response and fluctuations of the accommodation of the human eye.

Authors:  L J Bour
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The influence of method on the stability of dark focus position of accommodation.

Authors:  G Heron; A C Smith; B Winn
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Accommodation responses and refractive error.

Authors:  R J Maddock; M Millodot; S Leat; C A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  The pain in eyestrain.

Authors:  J M Heaton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  3 in total

1.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Spherical subjective refraction with a novel 3D virtual reality based system.

Authors:  Jaume Pujol; Juan Carlos Ondategui-Parra; Llorenç Badiella; Carles Otero; Meritxell Vilaseca; Mikel Aldaba
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-02-05

3.  The Effect of 3D Visual Simulator on Children's Visual Acuity - A Pilot Study Comparing Two Different Modalities.

Authors:  Takeshi Ide; Mariko Ishikawa; Kazuo Tsubota; Masaru Miyao
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2013-10-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.