Literature DB >> 7202784

Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: a demonstration study.

K R Widmer, G H McClelland, C A Nickerson.   

Abstract

The stopping rule measure of sex preferences represents a combination of psychological measures of preference and behavioral intentions. This study of 172 college students demonstrates that the stopping rule measure is a useful and practical method of measuring sex preferences. The results further indicate that parity progression ratio measures inherently underestimate the effect of sex preferences on individual fertility because they incorrectly assume that sex preferences (a) are homogeneous within the population and (b) can only act to increase, not to decrease, fertility. Use of the stopping rule measure to predict the possible effects of sex preselection techniques on fertility is also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7202784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  7 in total

1.  Prospective fertility and underlying preferences: a longitudinal study in Taiwan.

Authors:  L C Coombs
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1979-11

Review 2.  Sex preselection--not yet practical.

Authors:  W Rinehart
Journal:  Popul Rep I       Date:  1975-05

3.  Parental predetermination of the sex of offspring: the attitudes of young married couples with university education.

Authors:  S Rosenzweig; S Adelman
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1976-10

4.  Preferences for sex of children among U.S. couples.

Authors:  L C Coombs
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

5.  Sex preselection in the United States: some implications.

Authors:  C F Westoff; R R Rindfuss
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: a consideration of parity progression ratio, dominance, and stopping rule measures.

Authors:  G H McClelland
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1979-08

7.  Sex predetermination: its impact on fertility.

Authors:  G E Markle; C B Nam
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1971-03
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India.

Authors:  S Clark
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-02

2.  Knowing the fetal gender and its relationship to seeking prenatal care: results from Jordan.

Authors:  Nemeh Ahmad Al-Akour
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-11

3.  Sex preference and fertility behavior: a study of recent Indian data.

Authors:  N Das
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-11

4.  Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: the case of Korea.

Authors:  F Arnold
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1985-05

5.  Gender of children and birth timing.

Authors:  J D Teachman; P T Schollaert
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1989-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.