Literature DB >> 574464

Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: a consideration of parity progression ratio, dominance, and stopping rule measures.

G H McClelland.   

Abstract

The two methods commonly used to assess the effect of sex preferences on fertility are inadequate to the task. Parity progression ratio analyses suffer from logical problems stemming from the heterogeneity of sex preferences and the riskiness of fertility decisions. While conjoint measurement-dominance procedures overcome these logical problems, they cannot yield quantitative estimates of the impact of sex preferences on fertility. A stopping rule measure which overcomes these limitations is proposed and described and its potential for determining the effect of sex predetermination methods on population is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 574464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Demography        ISSN: 0070-3370


  7 in total

1.  Some possible effects of birth control on the human sex ratio.

Authors:  L A GOODMAN
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Parental predetermination of the sex of offspring: the attitudes of young married couples with university education.

Authors:  S Rosenzweig; S Adelman
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1976-10

3.  Gender preferences, sex predetermination, and family size in the United States.

Authors:  P Cutright; S Belt; J Scanzoni
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1974

4.  Sex preselection in the United States: some implications.

Authors:  C F Westoff; R R Rindfuss
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Some effects of being able to control sex of offspring.

Authors:  E Pohlman
Journal:  Eugen Q       Date:  1967-12

6.  Sex predetermination: its impact on fertility.

Authors:  G E Markle; C B Nam
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1971-03

7.  Family composition preferences in a developing culture: The case of Taiwan, 1973.

Authors:  L C Coombs; T H Sun
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  1978-03
  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Son preference and sex composition of children: evidence from India.

Authors:  S Clark
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2000-02

2.  Sex preference and fertility behavior: a study of recent Indian data.

Authors:  N Das
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-11

3.  The effect of sex preference on fertility: a reply to Bairagi.

Authors:  F Arnold
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-02

4.  A comment on Fred Arnold's "Measuring the effect of sex preferences on fertility".

Authors:  R Bairagi
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1987-02

5.  Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: a demonstration study.

Authors:  K R Widmer; G H McClelland; C A Nickerson
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1981-02

6.  Gender preference and birth spacing in Matlab, Bangladesh.

Authors:  M Rahman; J Da Vanzo
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1993-08

7.  Women's sex preferences in the United States: 1970 to 1975.

Authors:  A R Pebley; C F Westoff
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1982-05

8.  Post-neonatal mortality in rural India: implications of an economic model.

Authors:  G B Simmons; C Smucker; S Bernstein; E Jensen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1982-08

9.  Preference for sons, family size, and sex ratio: an empirical study in Korea.

Authors:  C B Park
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1983-08

10.  Measuring the effect of sex preference on fertility: the case of Korea.

Authors:  F Arnold
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1985-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.