Literature DB >> 7201266

Maternal, fetal, and neonatal responses after epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine, 2-chloroprocaine, or lidocaine.

T K Abboud, S S Khoo, F Miller, T Doan, E H Henriksen.   

Abstract

The effects of epidural analgesia on fetal heart rate, fetal heart rate variability, uterine activity, maternal blood pressure, newborn Apgar scores, neonatal acid base status, and the early neonatal neurobehavioral status were studied in 150 parturients during labor and delivery. Group I (n = 50) received 0.5% bupivacaine, group II (n = 50) received 2% 2-chloroprocaine, and in group III (n = 50) received 1.5% lidocaine. None of the three local anesthetics used had any significant effect on either base line fetal heart rate, beat-to-beat variability, or uterine activity. In cases in which monitoring of fetal heart rate was both technically satisfactory and continuous, late deceleration patterns were seen in 8 of 42, 0 of 34, and 3 of 47 of the fetuses in group I, II, and III, respectively. The difference in incidence of late deceleration patterns between groups I and II was statistically significant (p less than 0.025). Early neonatal neurobehavioral status did not differ among the three groups of neonates nor did any of the neonates in the three groups score lower than a control group of 20 neonates whose mothers did not receive any analgesia or medications for labor or delivery. It is concluded that epidural anesthesia as administered in this study has no significant effect on the base line fetal heart rate, uterine activity, or neurobehavioral status of the neonate, and that bupivacaine is associated with a higher incidence of what appears to be transient abnormalities of fetal heart rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7201266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  Haemodynamic consequences and uterine contractions following 0.5 or 1.0 litre crystalloid infusion before obstetric epidural analgesia.

Authors:  J E Zamora; O P Rosaeg; M P Lindsay; M L Crossan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Maternal positioning affects fetal heart rate changes after epidural analgesia for labour.

Authors:  R Preston; E T Crosby; D Kotarba; H Dudas; R D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Obstetrical anaesthesia update--1984.

Authors:  D R Biehl
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-05

Review 5.  Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R L Eberle; M C Norris
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Bupivacaine inhibits large conductance, voltage- and Ca2+- activated K+ channels in human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells.

Authors:  Pedro Martín; Nicolás Enrique; Ana R Roldán Palomo; Alejandro Rebolledo; Veronica Milesi
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Nicardipine reduces the cardio-respiratory toxicity of intravenously administered bupivacaine in rats.

Authors:  F Matsuda; W W Kinney; W Wright; J R Kambam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Vasoactive actions of local anaesthetics on human isolated umbilical veins and arteries.

Authors:  E Monuszko; S Halevy; K Freese; M Liu-Barnett; B Altura
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  The effect of lidocaine on regional blood flows and cardiac output in the non-stressed and the stressed foetal lamb.

Authors:  C Friesen; R Yarnell; C Bachman; R Meatheral; D Biehl
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.