Literature DB >> 720109

Comparison of computed tomography and ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a preliminary study.

M M Raskin, J B Cunningham.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound were equally effective in measuring the external diameter of atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms in 20 patients. Ultrasound was superior for determining the true lumen caliber and detecting mural thrombi. CT was superior for demonstrating aortic wall calcifications, but no more so than a plain film abdominal radiograph. Ultrasound should be the method of choice in the diagnosis, serial evaluation and management of a patient with an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 720109     DOI: 10.1016/0149-936x(78)90087-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 0149-936X


  3 in total

1.  Computed tomography in aortobifemoral Y grafts.

Authors:  A Tuchmann; W Hruby
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  G Fortner; K Johansen
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-01

3.  Abdominal calcifications and diagnostic imaging decision making: a topic review.

Authors:  John M Bassano
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2006
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.