Literature DB >> 19674671

Abdominal calcifications and diagnostic imaging decision making: a topic review.

John M Bassano1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review commonly encountered calcifications found within the abdomen as seen on the lumbar spine radiograph and to determine which advanced imaging modality is best to thoroughly assess the patient.
METHODS: Searches of electronic databases and textbooks were conducted to construct this narrative overview. DISCUSSION: By categorizing the type of calcification and localizing it anatomically, most often a definitive diagnosis can be reached. Two commonly encountered conditions, abdominal aortic aneurysms and urinary calculi, are used to compare the main advanced imaging modalities (diagnostic ultrasound and computed tomography) used to further assess abdominal calcifications.
CONCLUSION: In most circumstances, either diagnostic ultrasound or computed tomography will establish a definitive diagnosis and offer thorough imaging assessment for abdominal calcifications.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19674671      PMCID: PMC2647057          DOI: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60132-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  11 in total

1.  Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  M Patlas; A Farkas; D Fisher; I Zaghal; I Hadas-Halpern
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham.

Authors:  L I Kauppila; T McAlindon; S Evans; P W Wilson; D Kiel; D T Felson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Calcifications in the portal venous system: comparison of plain films, sonography, and CT.

Authors:  C Ayuso; P Luburich; R Vilana; C Bru; J Bruix
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: warning flags to watch for.

Authors:  E Fellows
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  S V Jackman; S R Potter; F Regan; T W Jarrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  [Diagnostic imaging of calculi in the upper urinary tract--sonography vs. computerized tomography].

Authors:  H C Thoeny; J Tuma; B Hess
Journal:  Ther Umsch       Date:  2003-02

7.  Comparison of computed tomography and ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a preliminary study.

Authors:  M M Raskin; J B Cunningham
Journal:  J Comput Tomogr       Date:  1978-03

8.  Prospective study of accuracy and outcome of emergency ultrasound for abdominal aortic aneurysm over two years.

Authors:  Vivek S Tayal; Christian D Graf; Michael A Gibbs
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Management of solitary iliac aneurysms.

Authors:  N P Sacks; S P Huddy; T Wegner; A E Giddings
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.888

10.  Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients.

Authors:  Tomás Ripollés; Marcos Agramunt; José Errando; María Jesús Martínez; Belén Coronel; María Morales
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Point-of-care ultrasound for evaluating intra-abdominal calcification in the pediatric emergency department: case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Vigil James; John Samuel; Chor Yek Kee; Gene Yong-Kwang Ong
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2020-12-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.