Literature DB >> 7190861

An investigation of variables in a fecal flotation technique.

M R O'Grady, J O Slocombe.   

Abstract

Several variables in a standard vial fecal gravitational flotation technique were investigated. These were the specific gravity of the sodium nitrate flotation solution, duration of flotation and mesh sizes of strainers. The number of eggs which floated and adhered to a coverslip were counted and estimates of the number of eggs remaining in the strained fecal suspension and in the feces trapped on the strainer were made. Eggs from hookworms, Trichuris vulpis and Toxocara canis in feces from dogs, Nematodirus spp. from sheep and Parascaris equorum from horses floated equally well in solutions with specific gravities (SpGr) ranging from 1.22-1.38. Taenia spp. from dogs had a slightly narrower range (SpGr 1.27-1.38) for best recovery. Eggs from Haemonchus contortus from sheep appeared to float best between SpGr 1.22- 1.32. Strongyles from one horse floated best with SpGr 1.27-1.32 and from another with SpGr 1.11-1.38. Coccidial oocysts from sheep floated best in a narrow range of SpGr from 1.22-1.27. However, as the SpGr of the solution was increased the recognition of eggs under the coverslip was increasingly difficult and especially so at SpGr 1.38 with sheep feces. This was due to the increasing amount of debris and the more rapid formation of crystals with evaporation with solutions of higher SpGr. It appeared, therefore, that solutions with SpGr of 1.22-1.35 would be best for routine laboratory use. At specific gravity 1.27, there appeared to be no difference in the number of eggs recovered for a four, eight and 12 min flotation period. Only 3-7% of the eggs in 4 g of feces were counted under the coverslip. This poor efficacy resulted first because approximately 50% of the eggs were trapped in the feces and retained on the strainer. Secondly, only one half of the strained fecal suspension, containing approximately 25% of the eggs, was placed in the vial for examination. Thirdly, of those eggs in the vial only 16-29% were counted under the coverslip. When the second half of the strained fecal suspension was placed in another vial, the amount of debris and air bubbles adhering to the coverslip was much less than that for the first vial. Egg counts for both vials appeared similar and it may be that when debris is excessive the fecal examination should involve counts from a second vial. The use of strainers finer than the standard tea strainer and the addition of minimal amounts of detergent did not increase the egg count.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7190861      PMCID: PMC1320050     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Comp Med        ISSN: 0008-4050


  1 in total

1.  Parasitisms in domesticated animals in Ontario. I. Ontario Veterinary College Records 1965-70.

Authors:  J O Slocombe
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 1.008

  1 in total
  10 in total

1.  Management of colon stents based on Bernoulli's principle.

Authors:  Yoshiharu Uno
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-16

2.  Evaluation of the Cornell-Wisconsin centrifugal flotation technique for recovering trichostrongylid eggs from bovine feces.

Authors:  T G Egwang; J O Slocombe
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1982-04

3.  Efficiency and sensitivity of techniques for recovering nematode eggs from bovine feces.

Authors:  T G Egwang; J O Slocombe
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1981-07

4.  Clonal diversity of the glutamate dehydrogenase gene in Giardia duodenalis from Thai isolates: evidence of genetic exchange or mixed infections?

Authors:  Suradej Siripattanapipong; Saovanee Leelayoova; Mathirut Mungthin; R C Andrew Thompson; Parima Boontanom; Wilai Saksirisampant; Peerapan Tan-Ariya
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Further evaluation and validation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: in-clinic feline and canine fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Yoko Nagamori; Ruth Hall Sedlak; Andrew DeRosa; Aleah Pullins; Travis Cree; Michael Loenser; Benjamin S Larson; Richard Boyd Smith; Cory Penn; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ganna Saelens; Lucy Robertson; Sarah Gabriël
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 7.  Comparative studies on faecal egg counting techniques used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites of equines: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdul Ghafar; Ghazanfar Abbas; Justine King; Caroline Jacobson; Kristopher J Hughes; Charles El-Hage; Anne Beasley; Jenni Bauquier; Edwina J A Wilkes; John Hurley; Lucy Cudmore; Peter Carrigan; Brett Tennent-Brown; Martin K Nielsen; Charles G Gauci; Ian Beveridge; Abdul Jabbar
Journal:  Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2021-08-09

8.  Detection of gastrointestinal parasitism at recreational canine sites in the USA: the DOGPARCS study.

Authors:  Kristina Stafford; Todd M Kollasch; Kathryn T Duncan; Stephanie Horr; Troy Goddu; Christine Heinz-Loomer; Anthony J Rumschlag; William G Ryan; Sarah Sweet; Susan E Little
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Evaluation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: an in-clinic canine and feline fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Yoko Nagamori; Ruth Hall Sedlak; Andrew DeRosa; Aleah Pullins; Travis Cree; Michael Loenser; Benjamin S Larson; Richard Boyd Smith; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Development and Evaluation of a Multiplex Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for Hookworm Species in Human Stool.

Authors:  Sze Fui Hii; Dammika Senevirathna; Stacey Llewellyn; Tawin Inpankaew; Peter Odermatt; Virak Khieu; Sinoun Muth; James McCarthy; Rebecca J Traub
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.345

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.