Literature DB >> 7180948

Does silent reading involve articulation? Evidence from tongue twisters.

L R Haber, R N Haber.   

Abstract

To demonstrate an interfering effect of subvocal articulation on otherwise silent reading, college-student subjects were asked to repeatedly read, either silently or aloud, both tongue-twister sentences and control sentences matched for syntactic complexity, syllable count, and sentential stress pattern. A technique was developed to measure the amount of time needed for each repetition of a sentence whether done silently or aloud. A significant difference in reading time for tongue twisters as compared to their matched controls was found for both silent as well as out-loud reading. A variety of different kinds of articulatory errors occurred in the oral repetitions, and the number of such errors was highly correlated with oral reading time. While errors could not be measured in silent reading, this correlation suggested that comparable articulatory disturbances accounted for the slower time to silently repeat tongue twisters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7180948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  7 in total

1.  Evidence for a late-occurring effect of phoneme repetition during silent reading.

Authors:  Shelia M Kennison; Jessica P Sieck; Kimberley A Briesch
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-05

2.  The effect of phonemic repetition on syntactic ambiguity resolution: implications for models of working memory.

Authors:  Shelia M Kennison
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-11

3.  At-lexical, articulatory interference in silent reading: the "upstream" tongue-twister effect.

Authors:  D H Robinson; A D Katayama
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

4.  The Rhymes that the Reader Perused Confused the Meaning: Phonological Effects during On-line Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading.

Authors:  Dave Kush; Clinton L Johns; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Short-term memory, working memory, and syntactic comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  David Caplan; Jennifer Michaud; Rebecca Hufford
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Filling Predictable and Unpredictable Gaps, with and without Similarity-Based Interference: Evidence for LIFG Effects of Dependency Processing.

Authors:  Kimberly Leiken; Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.