Literature DB >> 7178704

Inhaled lidocaine aerosol changes resting human breathing pattern.

J Savoy, S Dhingra, N R Anthonisen.   

Abstract

We compared resting breathing patterns in twelve normal humans before and after administration of aerosols of normal saline and 4% lidocaine. Experiments were performed in random order on two consecutive days in single blind fashion. At the time of the experiments, neither the subjects nor the people who analyzed the results knew the purpose of the study. Neither saline nor lidocaine aerosols produced changes in FEV1.0 or end-tidal PCO2, or, in the six subjects in whom measurements were made, changes in functional residual capacity or airway resistance. Aerosols of normal saline produced no change of ventilation (VI), breathing frequency (f), tidal volume (VT), duration of inspiration (Ti), mean inspiratory flow (VT/Ti) or the fraction of the breathing cycle devoted to inspiration (Ti/Tt). Lidocaine aerosols, on the other hand, were associated with a decrease in f (P less than 0.01), an increase in Ti (P less than 0.01), an increase in VT (P less than 0.02) and a decrease in VI (P less than 0.05), while VT/Ti and Ti/Tt were unchanged. We conclude that lidocaine aerosols, by compromising the function of vagal airway receptors, altered breathing pattern in normal resting humans, indicating that these receptors play a role in regulating breathing pattern under these circumstances. Though the changes we observed are most simply explained as being due to decreased stretch receptor activity, we cannot be certain that such was the case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7178704     DOI: 10.1016/0034-5687(82)90005-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Physiol        ISSN: 0034-5687


  4 in total

1.  Opposite responses to lidocaine between intrapulmonary mechanical and chemical sensors.

Authors:  Huafeng Li; Lei Du; Peyman Otmishi; Yuwen He; Juan Guardiola; Jerry Yu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Dyspnea: a sensory experience.

Authors:  R M Schwartzstein; H L Manning; J W Weiss; S E Weinberger
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Embracing a curiosity-driven approach in the microneurographic exploration of the human vagus nerves.

Authors:  Michael J Joyner; Stephen A Klassen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.228

4.  Sex-specific vagal and spinal modulation of breathing with chest compression.

Authors:  Alyssa Huff; Mitchell D Reed; Kimberly E Iceman; Dena R Howland; Teresa Pitts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.