Literature DB >> 7174847

Is post partum rubella vaccination worthwhile?

P D Griffiths, C Baboonian.   

Abstract

This study was designated to determine whether a program of screening for rubella antibodies during pregnancy, coupled with selective vaccination after delivery, could effectively increase herd immunity. One thousand women were studied when they returned for further antenatal care after having been screened, and possibly vaccinated, during an earlier pregnancy. Overall, the program was shown to be 83% effective since 108 women were truly seronegative in their initial pregnancies and 90 of them had been rendered immune by the time of their next pregnancy. The 18 failures of the program were attributed to the haemagglutination inhibition test employed (eight cases), failure to administer vaccine (seven cases) and true vaccine failures (three cases). Five pregnant women became infected with rubella virus during the study but all were in their initial pregnancies. All seronegative women were shown to follow the instruction not to become pregnant within three months of vaccination. We conclude that a program of screening for immunity, together with selective vaccination post partum, can significantly reduce both the number of susceptible women and the number who experience rubella infection during pregnancy. Such programs should be vigorously encouraged as a means of helping to prevent congenital rubella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7174847      PMCID: PMC497974          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.35.12.1340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  15 in total

1.  A comparative study of methods used for removing non-specific inhibitors of rubella haemagglutination from human sera.

Authors:  N Doherty; C J Ronalds; J R Pattison; R B Heath
Journal:  Med Lab Technol       Date:  1975-10

2.  A comparison of three tests for rubella antibody screening.

Authors:  P Morgan-Capner; H J Pullen; J R Pattison; D E Bidwell; A Bartlett; A Voller
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Postpartum rubella vaccination. A survey of private physicians in oregon.

Authors:  L V Cheldelin; D P Francis; H Tilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Rubella vaccination in the puerperium.

Authors:  J M Beazley; R Hurley; C Middlebrook; M F Rumpus
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1971-08

5.  Rubella: the U. K. experience.

Authors:  J A Dudgeon
Journal:  Dev Biol Stand       Date:  1979

6.  Rubella screening and follow-up immunization in Vermont.

Authors:  G J Povar; M Maloney; W N Watson; A M McBean; G Giguere
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Post-partum vaccination of rubella-susceptible women.

Authors:  D M Horstmann; H Liebhaber; E I Kohorn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Maternal rubella at St. Thomas' Hospital: is there a need to change British vaccination policy?

Authors:  P N Goldwater; J R Quiney; J E Banatvala
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Further evaluation of the optimum age for rubella vaccine administration.

Authors:  J Wilkins; P F Wehrle
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1979-12

10.  Congenital rubella surveillance.

Authors:  C S Peckham
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1978-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Immunisation policies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-04-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.