Literature DB >> 715553

Developmental lumbar spinal stenosis. Pathology and surgical treatment.

C K Lee, H T Hansen, A B Weiss.   

Abstract

The purpose of this presentation is to outline the extent of surgical resection necessary for complete decompression of the neural elements in spinal stenosis and to introduce a system for the evaluation of disability in patients with spinal stenosis. Sixteen patients with the confirmed diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated by the system. Ten cases were treated surgically. Indications for operative treatment were 1) intolerable pain in average daily living, 2) progressively worsening or significant degree of motor weakness, and 3) sphincter dysfunction. Satisfactory results from operative treatment were expected only after adequate and thorough decompression. The extent of surgical decompression was determined by clinical evaluation, myelographic examination, and by the type of disease process exhibited. The most common cause of unsatisfactory results was inadequate decompression of spinal contents. The extent of adequate decompression is described according to three different variations of pathologic anatomy of spinal stenosis: a) concentric contraction of the spinal canal, b) sagittal flattening of the spinal canal, and c) stenosis caused by anomalous articular process(es). No excellent results were obtained even after thorough and adequate decompression of spinal contents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 715553     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197809000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients.

Authors:  H Kaptan; M Ilhan; K Cakiroglu; O Kasimcan; C Kilic
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Comparison of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1975 to 1995.

Authors:  O Niggemeyer; J M Strauss; K P Schulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar disc herniation in patients with developmental spinal stenosis.

Authors:  L Y Dai; B Ni; L S Jia; H K Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Towards personalized and value-based spine care: objective patient monitoring with smartphone activity data.

Authors:  Hasan S Ahmad; Andrew I Yang; Gregory W Basil; William C Welch; Michael Y Wang; Jang W Yoon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

5.  Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Naosuke Kamei; Risako Yamamoto; Toshio Nakamae; Bunichiro Izumi; Ryo Ohta; Yuki Fujioka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-06

6.  Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: patients' postoperative disability and working capacity.

Authors:  O Airaksinen; A Herno; T Saari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Prevalence and Definition of Multilevel Lumbar Developmental Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Marcus Kin Long Lai; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-23

8.  The paradoxical relationship between ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and developmental lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Vivian Tam; Victor Yu Leong Leung; Dino Samartzis; Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2016-09-05

9.  Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Qingquan Kong; Yuqing Yan; Pin Feng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.