Literature DB >> 7155472

Prelabor evaluation of inducibility.

A P Lange, N J Secher, J G Westergaard, I Skovgård.   

Abstract

Data were collected prospectively on 381 patients admitted for stimulation of labor because of premature rupture of the membranes and 808 patients for induction of labor. The induction was by primary amniotomy in 337 cases, and the remaining 471 cases, because of relatively unfavorable cervical conditions, were treated without primary amniotomy. Induction of labor failed on the first day in 181 of the cases with an unfavorable cervix. All patients were delivered vaginally of one living infant in cephalic presentation. The predictive value of the Bishop pelvic score and other factors regarding the duration of labor (induction-delivery time) and the inducibility of labor (latency period) were evaluated by multiple regression analyses. The influence of parity on duration of labor was found to be very constant and highly significant, whereas it seemed to have only little influence on inducibility. The only factor of significant importance to inducibility thus seems to be the prelabor cervical condition. Of the 5 components in the Bishop score, dilatation was found to be most important and should be weighted at least twice the value given it by Bishop. A new pelvic score for prelabor evaluation of inducibility is proposed on the basis of these results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7155472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Nuchal cord entanglement and outcome of labour induction.

Authors:  Tullio Ghi; Laura D'Emidio; Raffaella Morandi; Paolo Casadio; Gianluigi Pilu; Giuseppe Pelusi
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-10

2.  Fibroblast heterogeneity: existence of functionally distinct Thy 1(+) and Thy 1(-) human female reproductive tract fibroblasts.

Authors:  L Koumas; A E King; H O Critchley; R W Kelly; R P Phipps
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Madeline M Rice; Uma M Reddy; Alan T N Tita; Robert M Silver; Gail Mallett; Kim Hill; Elizabeth A Thom; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Annette Perez-Delboy; Dwight J Rouse; George R Saade; Kim A Boggess; Suneet P Chauhan; Jay D Iams; Edward K Chien; Brian M Casey; Ronald S Gibbs; Sindhu K Srinivas; Geeta K Swamy; Hyagriv N Simhan; George A Macones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Development of a visually guided Raman spectroscopy probe for cervical assessment during pregnancy.

Authors:  Christine M O'Brien; Katherine J Cochran; Laura E Masson; Mack Goldberg; Eric Marple; Kelly A Bennett; Jeff Reese; James C Slaughter; J M Newton; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.207

5.  Preterm prediction study: comparison of the cervical score and Bishop score for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  R B Newman; R L Goldenberg; J D Iams; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A H Moawad; E Thom; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; M Dombrowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Liping Sun; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.623

7.  NICU Admission for Term Neonates in a Large Single-Center Population: A Comprehensive Assessment of Risk Factors Using a Tandem Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Shahar Talisman; Joshua Guedalia; Rivka Farkash; Tehila Avitan; Naama Srebnik; Yair Kasirer; Michael S Schimmel; Dunia Ghanem; Ron Unger; Sorina Grisaru Granovsky
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.