Literature DB >> 7149815

Patterns of axillary nodal involvement in breast cancer. Predictability of level one dissection.

R S Boova, R Bonanni, F E Rosato.   

Abstract

Two hundred consecutive mastectomies with total axillary dissection were analyzed for patterns of involvement at levels one, two and three. The purpose was to determine the accuracy of level one axillary dissection in predicting the status of the entire lymph node chain in carcinoma of the breast. Level one was defined as latissimus dorsi to lateral pectoralis minor; level two behind the pectoralis minor and level three medial pectoralis minor to thoracic inlet. The average number of nodes analyzed per patient was 22. The average number of nodes recovered per level was 14 at level one, 11.5 at level two and eight at level three. One hundred twenty patients (60%) had no nodal involvement, while 80 patients had metastases to axillary lymph nodes. There were seven patients (3.5% of the entire 200) who had positive nodes at levels two and/or three without metastasis to level one. This represents the incidence of "skip" metastases. The group exhibiting "skip" metastases comprise 5.5% of patients (seven of 127) with negative axillary nodes at level one and 8.7% of patients (seven of 80) with axillary metastases secondary to carcinoma of the breast. In the authors' experience, level one lymph node dissection is an accurate predictor of the status of the entire lymph node chain. Negative nodes at level one would indicate lack of involvement at levels two and three with nearly 95% accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7149815      PMCID: PMC1352977          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198212001-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

Review 1.  Value of limited surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  U Veronesi
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  SIGNIFICANCE OF LOCATION AND NUMBER OF AXILLARY METASTASES IN CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST.

Authors:  H AUCHINCLOSS
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The significance of axillary node levels in the study of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J W BERG
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1955 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.

Authors:  C Wastell
Journal:  Surg Annu       Date:  1978

5.  Carcinoma of the breast: analysis of total lymph node involvement versus level of metastasis.

Authors:  J A Smith; J J Gamez-Araujo; H S Gallager; E C White; C M McBride
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Conservation surgery and irradiation for the treatment of favorable breast cancer.

Authors:  E D Montague; A E Gutierrez; J L Barker; N D Tapley; G H Fletcher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Radiation therapy as primary treatment for early stage carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  L R Prosnitz; I S Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 6.860

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Axillary staging of breast cancer and the sentinel node.

Authors:  G Cserni
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Radical axillary dissection in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Ball; R Waters; S Fish; J M Thomas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Complications of level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  D F Roses; A D Brooks; M N Harris; R L Shapiro; J Mitnick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  I C Smith; K N Ogston; P Whitford; F W Smith; P Sharp; M Norton; I D Miller; A K Ah-See; S D Heys; J A Jibril; O Eremin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; D M Kirgan; J M Guenther; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Discrepancies in current practice of pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Results of a questionnaire based survey by the European Working Group for Breast Screening Pathology.

Authors:  G Cserni; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; W Boecker; B Borisch; C E Connolly; T Decker; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; H Kerner; J Kulka; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; P Regitnig; A Reiner; A Sapino; B Sigal-Zafrani; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya; G Fejes; C A Wells
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.