OBJECTIVE: To assess the complications of level I and II axillary lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer, with breast-conservation surgery and mastectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The role of axillary dissection for staging, and as an effective means of controlling regional nodal disease, has long been recognized. As small and low-grade lesions have been detected more frequently, and as its therapeutic impact has been questioned, axillary dissection has increasingly been perceived as associated with significant complications. METHODS: Two hundred patients, 112 of whom had breast-conservation surgery with axillary dissection and 88 of whom had total mastectomy with axillary dissection, were evaluated 1 year or more after surgery for arm swelling as well as nonedema complications. All patients had arm circumference measurements at the same four sites on both the operated and nonoperated sides. RESULTS: No patient had an axillary recurrence. The mean difference in circumference on the nonoperated versus operated side was 0.425 cm +/- 1.39 at the midbiceps (p < 0.001), 0.315 cm +/- 1.27 at the antecubital fossa (p < 0.001), 0.355 cm +/- 1.53 at the midforearm (p < 0.005), and 0.055 cm +/- 0.75 at the wrist (n.s.). Seven patients (3.5%) had mild swelling of the hand. Heavy and obese body habitus were the only significant predictors of edema on multivariate analysis. One hundred fifty-three (76.5%) patients had numbness or paresthesias of the medial arm and/or axilla after surgery; in 125 (82%) of these, the problem had lessened or had resolved on follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of a level I and II axillary dissection as a procedure with significant complications does not appear justified based on this experience.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the complications of level I and II axillary lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer, with breast-conservation surgery and mastectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The role of axillary dissection for staging, and as an effective means of controlling regional nodal disease, has long been recognized. As small and low-grade lesions have been detected more frequently, and as its therapeutic impact has been questioned, axillary dissection has increasingly been perceived as associated with significant complications. METHODS: Two hundred patients, 112 of whom had breast-conservation surgery with axillary dissection and 88 of whom had total mastectomy with axillary dissection, were evaluated 1 year or more after surgery for arm swelling as well as nonedema complications. All patients had arm circumference measurements at the same four sites on both the operated and nonoperated sides. RESULTS: No patient had an axillary recurrence. The mean difference in circumference on the nonoperated versus operated side was 0.425 cm +/- 1.39 at the midbiceps (p < 0.001), 0.315 cm +/- 1.27 at the antecubital fossa (p < 0.001), 0.355 cm +/- 1.53 at the midforearm (p < 0.005), and 0.055 cm +/- 0.75 at the wrist (n.s.). Seven patients (3.5%) had mild swelling of the hand. Heavy and obese body habitus were the only significant predictors of edema on multivariate analysis. One hundred fifty-three (76.5%) patients had numbness or paresthesias of the medial arm and/or axilla after surgery; in 125 (82%) of these, the problem had lessened or had resolved on follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of a level I and II axillary dissection as a procedure with significant complications does not appear justified based on this experience.
Authors: U Veronesi; F Rilke; A Luini; V Sacchini; V Galimberti; T Campa; E Dei Bei; M Greco; A Magni; M Merson Journal: Cancer Date: 1987-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter N Zawaneh; Sunil P Singh; Robert F Padera; Peter W Henderson; Jason A Spector; David Putnam Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Gilles Berclaz; Ossi R Koechli; Gabriel Schaer; Mathias K Fehr; Thomas Hess; Daniel Oertli; Lucio Bronz; Beate Schnarwyler; Edward Wight; Urs Uehlinger; Eduard Infanger; Daniel Burger; Markus Zuber Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 12.969