Literature DB >> 7148822

Risk indicators of breast and cervical cancer on ecologic and individual levels.

M Hakama, T Hakulinen, E Pukkala, E Saxén, L Teppo.   

Abstract

Ecologic and individual risk indicators were derived from the population censuses of Finland Cancer Registry. The years covered in the study were 1955-1974 for the ecologic analysis and 1971-1975 for the analysis on individuals. The incidence of both diseases was high in an urban environment with high standard of living. The individuals with high risk of breast cancer were of high socioeconomic status and were well educated, whereas cervical cancer was common among women of low socioeconomic status and with less education. Conceptually similar indicators used on both the ecologic and individual levels characterize different aspects of risk; for example, a woman with a low standard of living in a well-to-do environment has a high risk of cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7148822     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

1.  The evolution of breast cancer mortality and morbidity in Spain (1977-1988).

Authors:  M M Morales Suarez-Varela; A Llopis González; E Soto Pinchel; M C Jiménez López
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Temporal trends in the socioeconomic gradient for breast cancer mortality among US women.

Authors:  D K Wagener; A Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Socioeconomic differences in cervical cancer: two case-control studies in Colombia and Spain.

Authors:  S de Sanjosé; F X Bosch; N Muñoz; L Tafur; M Gili; I Izarzugaza; A Izquierdo; C Navarro; A Vergara; M T Muñoz; N Ascunce; K V Shah
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Risk factors of female cancers in Ragusa population (Sicily). 2. Breast cancer.

Authors:  R Cusimano; G Dardanoni; L Dardanoni; P Amendola; G Greco; R Spampinato; L Gafa
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Cancer differentials among US blacks and whites: quantitative estimates of socioeconomic-related risks.

Authors:  K M Gorey; J E Vena
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Socioeconomic status, neighborhood social conditions, and neural tube defects.

Authors:  C R Wasserman; G M Shaw; S Selvin; J B Gould; S L Syme
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Estimation of cancer burden in Brezice municipality, a community neighboring Krsko nuclear power plant in Slovenia.

Authors:  Vesna Zadnik; Tina Zagar; Samo Drobne; Maja Primic Zakelj
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Risk factors of female cancers in Ragusa population (Sicily)--1. Endometrium and cervix uteri cancers.

Authors:  R Cusimano; G Dardanoni; L Dardanoni; M La Rosa; G Pavone; R Tumino; L Gafà
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.