Literature DB >> 7140570

[Apical two-dimensional echocardiography: normal values for single- and bi-plane determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction].

R Erbel, P Schweizer, G Henn, J Meyer, S Effert.   

Abstract

A difference was obtained between cineventriculography and 2-D echocardiography in the determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Normal values obtained by the former could not be used for the latter. The authors, therefore, determined their own normal values. Apical 2-D echocardiography was used for the normal group (35 males, mean age 30.2 years; 20 females, mean age 26.2 years). In addition to mean values and standard deviations, one-sided tolerance limits (T) were calculated, separating the normal range from abnormal within 95% confidence limits for 90% of the total group. End-diastolic and end-systolic volume index in males was 66.8 +/- 8.8 ml/m2 compared with 26.9 +/- 5.2 ml/m2 on biplane evaluation. Tolerance limits were calculated at 82.0 and 35.9 ml/m2, respectively. Stroke volume index was 39.9 +/- 7.0 ml/m2, T = 27.8 ml/m2, ejection fraction 59.2 +/- 6.0%, T = 48.8%. End-diastolic and -systolic volume index for females had a mean of 60.7 +/- 12.5 ml/m2, T = 85.0 ml/m2, and 25.7 +/- 7.4 ml/m2, T = 40.1 ml/m2, respectively. Stroke volume index was 56.5 +/- 10.6 ml/m2, T = 35.9 ml/m2, the ejection fraction 58.1 +/- 6.5%, T = 45.5%. Between monoplane and biplane measurements of apical 2-D echocardiograms there was no significant difference. Normal values for volume and ejection fraction of the left ventricle, determined from apical four-chamber and RAO-equivalent cuts make it possible to categorize the function of the heart and to provide the basis for further studies of the sensitivity and specificity of the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7140570     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1070223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  5 in total

1.  Sex differences in myocardial oxygen and glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Linda R Peterson; Pablo F Soto; Pilar Herrero; Kenneth B Schechtman; Carmen Dence; Robert J Gropler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  U Sechtem; P Pflugfelder; C B Higgins
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Echocardiographic findings and abnormalities in HIV-infected patients: results from a large, prospective, multicenter HIV-heart study.

Authors:  Nico Reinsch; Philipp Kahlert; Stefan Esser; Andreas Sundermeyer; Katrin Neuhaus; Norbert Brockmeyer; Anja Potthoff; Raimund Erbel; Thomas Buck; Till Neumann
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-07-30

4.  Comparison of cardiac output measured with echocardiographic volumes and aortic Doppler methods during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  O Axler; B Megarbane; C Lentschener; H Fernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac volumes and regional function after myocardial infarction: an intrasubject comparison using simultaneous intrasubject recordings.

Authors:  Blake I Gardner; Scott E Bingham; Marvin R Allen; Duane D Blatter; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.062

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.