Literature DB >> 7140151

Sagittal diameter of the cervical canal in normal Indian adults.

S K Gupta, R C Roy, A Srivastava.   

Abstract

This paper is based on a radiographic study of 300 normal individuals from 18 to 34 years of age comprising 207 males and 93 females. A lateral radiograph of the cervical spine with a focal-film distance of 6 ft was obtained of each subject to measure the sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal. The mean sagittal diamter ranged from 21.43 mm at C1 to 16.42 mm at C7 in males and from 20.13 mm at C1 to 15.54 mm C7 in females. This diameter decreased from C1 down to C4 or C5 where there was a gradual but marginal increase to C6. This diameter was smallest at C7. In general the sagittal diameters In females were about 1 mm less than in males at all vertebral levels. The smallest sagittal diamter from C3 to C7 in both sexes was 13 mm. The largest sagittal diameter varied from 20.5 to 28 mm in males and 18.5 to 26 mm in females. The mean sagittal diameter showed some relationship to height in males. No significant difference was observed in relation to weight. The posterior component of the sagittal diameter was smaller in females than in males due to a difference in development of the laminae.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7140151     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(82)80403-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  14 in total

1.  Lesson of the week: Degenerative cervical disc disease causing cord compression in adults under 50.

Authors:  P I Bentley; C J Grigor; J D McNally; S Rigby; C S Higgens; A O Frank; A Keat
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

2.  Spinal canal narrowing during simulated frontal impact.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Adam M Pearson; S Elena Gimenez; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: Radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Kota Suda; Masatsune Yamagata; Takayoshi Ueta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Risk factors in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Sudhir Singh; Dharmendra Kumar; Sanjeev Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-08-13

5.  Establishment of parameters for congenital stenosis of the cervical spine: an anatomic descriptive analysis of 1,066 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Ernest Y Young; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Myelographic findings in cervical spines without degenerative changes. Special reference to sagittal diameter of the dural sac.

Authors:  P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Variation of C1 spinolaminar line and prevalence of C1 stenosis in normal population.

Authors:  Sombat Kunakornsawat; Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn; Pritsanai Pruttikul; Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew; Kanthika Wasinpongwanich; Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-03

8.  Cervical spine taper ratios: Normal tolerance limits.

Authors:  Adrienne Thompson; Ryan Zea; Victor Haughton
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-05-09

9.  Risk Prediction for Development of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Spinal Instability.

Authors:  Soo Eon Lee; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  Spinolaminar Line Test as a Screening Tool for C1 Stenosis.

Authors:  Yasushi Oshima; Michael P Kelly; Kwang-Sup Song; Moon Soo Park; Tapanut Chuntarapas; Katie D Vo; Jin S Yeom; Katsushi Takeshita; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.