Literature DB >> 7125880

[Visual prevention from motion sickness in cars].

T Probst, S Krafczyk, W Büchele, T Brandt.   

Abstract

The differential effects of vision on motion sickness in cars were tested under real road conditions using linear accelerations, in order to confirm earlier laboratory results on visual modulation of vestibular nausea induced by angular accelerations of the body. The 18 voluntary subjects were exposed to repetitive braking maneuvers (linear accelerations: 0.1-1.2 g) on a highway. The simultaneous visual stimulus conditions for the 3 separate days were: I) eyes open, visual control of car motion; II) eyes closed; III) eyes open, artificial stationary visual field (reading). The severity of motion sickness (magnitude estimation 1-10) was a function of the visual stimulus condition with significant differences among these conditions: I) moderate nausea (less than 1) with adequate visual motion perception; II) medium nausea (approximately equal to 2) with eyes closed and somatosensory-vestibular excitation only; III) strong nausea (greater than 5) with conflicting sensory input, when vestibular acceleration is in disagreement with the visual information of no movement. Providing ample peripheral vision of the relatively moving surround is the best strategy to alleviate car sickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7125880     DOI: 10.1007/bf00342721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)


  33 in total

1.  The physiology of symptoms. III. Nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  A J CUMMINS
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1958-10

2.  Postural behavior and motion sickness.

Authors:  T Fukuda
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1975

3.  The Sense of Rotation and the Anatomy and Physiology of the Semicircular Canals of the Internal Ear.

Authors:  A C Brown
Journal:  J Anat Physiol       Date:  1874-05

4.  Differential effects of central verses peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; E Koenig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A psychophysiological test for motion-sickness susceptibility.

Authors:  D M Parker
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1971-07

6.  [Visually induced pseudocoriolis-effects and circularvection. A contribution to opto-vestibular interaction].

Authors:  T Brandt; E Wist; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1971

7.  A provocative test for grading susceptibility to motion sickness yielding a single numerical score.

Authors:  E F Miller; A Graybiel
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1970

Review 8.  The multisensory physiological and pathological vertigo syndromes.

Authors:  T Brandt; R B Daroff
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Concomitant visual stimulation does not alter habituation of nystagmic, oculogyral or psychophysical responses to angular acceleration.

Authors:  J H Brown; G H Crampton
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1966 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model.

Authors:  J T Reason
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  Vertical heterophoria and susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Danielle N Jackson; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2012-03

2.  Knowing What's Coming: Unpredictable Motion Causes More Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Ouren X Kuiper; Jelte E Bos; Eike A Schmidt; Cyriel Diels; Stefan Wolter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  Electrogastrography in Autonomous Vehicles-An Objective Method for Assessment of Motion Sickness in Simulated Driving Environments.

Authors:  Timotej Gruden; Nenad B Popović; Kristina Stojmenova; Grega Jakus; Nadica Miljković; Sašo Tomažič; Jaka Sodnik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.