Literature DB >> 4695777

Differential effects of central verses peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception.

T Brandt, J Dichgans, E Koenig.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1973        PMID： 4695777     DOI： 10.1007/bf00234474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN： 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  The problems of the spinning top applied to the semi-circular canals.

Authors:  J J GROEN
Journal:  Confin Neurol       Date:  1961

2.  [The activity of single neurons in the region of vestibular nuclei in horizontal acceleration, with special reference to vestibular nystagmus].

Authors:  F DUENSING; K P SCHAEFER
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr       Date:  1958

3.  On the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  [Circular vection, visually induced pseudocoriolis effects, optokinetic afernystagmus. A comparative study of subjective and objective optokinetic aftereffects].

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1972

5.  Perception of self-rotation (circular vection) induced by optokinetic stimuli.

Authors:  T Brandt; J Dichgans; E Koenig
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Moving visual scenes influence the apparent direction of gravity.

Authors:  J Dichgans; R Held; L R Young; T Brandt
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Efferent influence on the vestibular organ during active movements of the body.

Authors:  R Klinke
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  [Visually induced pseudocoriolis-effects and circularvection. A contribution to opto-vestibular interaction].

Authors:  T Brandt; E Wist; J Dichgans
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1971

9.  [Motion detection, optokinetic nystagmus and moving retinal images. The influence of visual attention on 2 mechanisms of motion detection].

Authors:  F Körner; J Dichgans
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1967

10.  [Comparative scaling of afferent and efferent motion detection in man: linear functions with different slopes].

Authors:  J Dichgans; F Körner; K Voigt
Journal:  Psychol Forsch       Date:  1969-06-11
  10 in total
  125 in total

1.  Perception of linear horizontal self-motion induced by peripheral vision (linearvection) basic characteristics and visual-vestibular interactions.

Authors:  A Berthoz; B Pavard; L R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Visual and vestibular cue integration for heading perception in extrastriate visual cortex.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Yong Gu; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Redirection of gaze and switching of attention during rapid stepping reactions evoked by unpredictable postural perturbation.

Authors:  John L Zettel; Andrea Holbeche; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion.

Authors:  W H Warren; K J Kurtz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

7.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Induced motion of a fixated target: influence of voluntary eye deviation.

Authors:  T Heckmann; R B Post; L Deering
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-09

9.  Treadmill locomotion captures visual perception of apparent motion.

Authors:  Yoshiko Yabe; Gentaro Taga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Arthrokinetic nystagmus and ego-motion sensation.

Authors:  T Brandt; W Büchele; F Arnold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.