Literature DB >> 7124795

Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. II: Quantitative analysis of a transcript of a genetic counseling session.

S Kessler, A G Jacopini.   

Abstract

The Bales system of scoring small group interactions was used to analyze a transcript of a preamniocentesis (genetic) counseling session in which a husband (H), wife (W), and a male counselor (C) participated. Scoring required the subdivision of communication into the smallest meaningful and scorable units, assigning each unit one of twelve possible category scores and designating the initiator and intended recipient(s) of the unit. The categories included "positive" and "negative" reactions, questions and attempted answers. Over half the units were found to consist of interactions in which information, orientation, and clarification were provided. C initiated 54% of all units of which three-quarters consisted of factual information regarding amniocentesis, genetic risks, Down syndrome, and mental retardation. C interacted significantly more frequently with W than with H, but units directed toward H were significantly more positive than those toward W. One interaction, in which C responded to affective material, significantly altered the subsequent frequency and direction of units; H became more verbal and there was an increase in further affective expression. Although evidence of persuasion was present, no directiveness was demonstrated. The data show that quantitative study of genetic counseling is feasible. Further research on different counseling styles and on the influence of specific interventions on later outcome has been undertaken.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7124795     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320120406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  9 in total

1.  Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: XII. More on counseling skills.

Authors:  Seymour Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients' expectations.

Authors:  S Michie; T M Marteau; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Report from the UK and Eire Association of Genetic Nurses and Counsellors (AGNC) supervision working group on genetic counselling supervision.

Authors:  Alison Clarke; Anna Middleton; Lorraine Cowley; Penny Guilbert; Rhona Macleod; Angus Clarke; Van Tran
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lobb; Phyllis Butow; Alexandra Barratt; Bettina Meiser; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Debra Roter; William N Dudley; Bonnie J Baty; Renn Upchurch; Susan Larson; Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Elizabeth A Lobb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees' post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Alexandra M van Dulmen; Frits A Beemer; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.