Literature DB >> 712010

Strength of the pitches associated with ripple noise.

W A Yost.   

Abstract

A discrimination procedure was used to measure the pitch strength of the repetition pitches associated with comb-filtered or ripple noise. Pitch strength was measured as a function of overall ripple noise level, the repetition pitch of the noise, and as a function of the center frequency of 1/3-octave bandpass filtered noise. In addition, other experiments were conducted to help determine which parameters should be used in measuring pitch strength when the discrimination procedure is employed. Pitch strength was strongest for pitches of approximately 500 Hz. The stimuli had essentially no pitch strength for pitches below 50 and above 2000 Hz. The strongest pitches were obtained when 1/3-octave filters were placed in a frequency region cented at four times the repetition pitch. Filtering at other center frequencies resulted in a large decrease in pitch strength. These results are consistent with assumptions concerning the dominant region for pitch perception of complex stimuli. The results are also discussed in terms of processing information from reflected sound sources.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 712010     DOI: 10.1121/1.382021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins; Supraja Anand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of the missing fundamental by chinchillas in the presence of low-pass masking noise.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-25

Review 4.  Bats and frogs and animals in between: evidence for a common central timing mechanism to extract periodicity pitch.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Pitch strength of regular-interval click trains with different length "runs" of regular intervals.

Authors:  William A Yost; Dan Mapes-Riordan; William Shofner; Raymond Dye; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Perception of acoustic iterance: pitch and infrapitch.

Authors:  R M Warren; J A Bashford
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-04

7.  Auditory stream segregation of iterated rippled noises by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Daniel E Shearer; Michelle R Molis; Keri O Bennett; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Representation of the spectral dominance region of pitch in the steady-state temporal discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus units.

Authors:  William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  High Ripple-Density Resolution for Discriminating Between Rippled and Nonrippled Signals: Effect of Temporal Processing or Combination Products?

Authors:  Dmitry I Nechaev; Olga N Milekhina; Marina S Tomozova; Alexander Y Supin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A New Approach to Model Pitch Perception Using Sparse Coding.

Authors:  Oded Barzelay; Miriam Furst; Omri Barak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.