Literature DB >> 7119855

Myoelectric responses at flexors and extensors of human wrist to step torque perturbations.

R J Jaeger, G L Gottlieb, G C Agarwal.   

Abstract

1. Torque-step perturbations were applied to flex or extend the wrists of normal human subjects. The electromyographic activity (EMG) of two of the stretched muscles, flexor carpi radialis and extensor carpi radialis, was monitored. 2. Based on functional characteristics and temporal bursting patterns, the EMG responses were partitioned into four distinct temporal intervals : 30-60, 60-120, 120-200, and greater than 200 ms after the onset of the torque step. The last interval continues for the duration of the step input: 200- 400 ms was chosen to represent activity in this interval. 3. EMG responses in the first two intervals show short, stable latencies and amplitudes that depend on the level of muscle contraction prior to the torque step. They are facilitated by any instruction requiring a reaction by the subject. They are reflexes that cannot be voluntarily suppressed by instruction to the subject. 4. The third EMG response is a triggered response. It is not a reflex because its appearance or absence is absolutely under voluntary control. Unlike true voluntary responses, there exists no dichotomy in responses latency or variability between known versus unknown directions of torque steps. 5. We consider that a truly voluntary response to a torque perturbation does not begin until about 200 ms after the step, which is on the order of visual or auditory reaction times. 6. The EMG responses were similar in both the wrist flexor and extensor studied. Ankle flexors and extensors do not show such similarity. 7. The EMG responses at the wrist and ankle are compared and shown to have many similarities. A general scheme for their classification is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7119855     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.2.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Melody A Polych; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Proprioceptive reaction times and long-latency reflexes in humans.

Authors:  C D Manning; S A Tolhurst; P Bawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiler; Paul L Gribble; J Andrew Pruszynski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-latency reflexes of elbow and shoulder muscles suggest reciprocal excitation of flexors, reciprocal excitation of extensors, and reciprocal inhibition between flexors and extensors.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Jenna Meriggi; Nidhi Parikh; Kenneth Saad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The effect of task instruction on the excitability of spinal and supraspinal reflex pathways projecting to the biceps muscle.

Authors:  Gwyn N Lewis; Colum D MacKinnon; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Wrist muscle activation patterns and stiffness associated with stable and unstable mechanical loads.

Authors:  S J De Serres; T E Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Temporal evolution of "automatic gain-scaling".

Authors:  J Andrew Pruszynski; Isaac Kurtzer; Timothy P Lillicrap; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An identified model for human wrist movements.

Authors:  S L Lehman; B M Calhoun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness.

Authors:  T E Milner; C Cloutier; A B Leger; D W Franklin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.